Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING <br /> HELD JUNE 25, 1997 <br /> Schneider referred to the resolutions granting a conditional use permit in 1994 and 1997. Page 2 of <br /> Document#1, 5-9-94 (Resolution No. 3424)confirms his chronology of use. <br /> "6. ...the Art Center of Minnesota leased the facility from the new owner for ... <br /> continuing use of the facility for art... <br /> 7. From the later part of 1990 through the present,the facility has served as a licensed <br /> day care and a dance school." <br /> Schneider stated he would show that the building was not used as a licensed day care but that there <br /> were children at the dance school. <br /> Document #2, 5-27-92 (Resolution No. 3908) reaffirms the chronology and states the facility has <br /> never been used as a residential dwelling. <br /> Schneider continued with occupancy issues and his Agenda WORKING FROM PRESENT TO <br /> PAST to support his position that the Hill School has always been an E-1 occupancy and the <br /> occupancy classification never changed. <br /> 1. ATELIER LESUEUR NEVER REQUESTED NOR OCCUPIED BUILDING AS <br /> B-2 (CITY PRESENTED TO CODE BOARD AS B-2??) <br /> DOCUMENTS #3 AND #4 � <br /> - Document#3,a memo from Lyle Oman and Bruce Vang to Jeanne Mabusth <br /> dated April 18, 1994, states "The new use is classified as a B-2 occupancy <br /> which is different than the previous school use(an E occupancy)and the day <br /> care use (an R occupancy)." <br /> A letter from the architect,Jennifer Yoos,dated June 13, 1997 indicates that <br /> discussions held with Oman always included children and they never made <br /> the request to change the building occupancy to a B-2 classification. <br /> - In a letter dated November 8, 1994 from Jennifer Yoos to Atelier LeSueur, <br /> she indicates a"preliminary study" suggested B-2 occupancy. This study was <br /> done in response to a City request. However, in April of the same year the <br /> City had already classified the use as B-2. <br /> - Schneider was still the owner and was never contacted about how the <br /> building was being used. <br /> - In August of 1995, Oman responds to Atelier LeSueur noting a preliminary <br /> � review had been done. <br /> 2 <br />