Laserfiche WebLink
�- <br /> Mr. Randy Rosengren <br /> . October 10, 1991 <br /> Page 2 • <br /> At any rate, the two apparent choices for resolving the current <br /> problem are to repair and expand the existing system or replace it <br /> entirely. Given that your alternate site is at the base of the slope <br /> which would greatly increase the costs of system construction, it <br /> would make sense to try to make the existing system function. <br /> As we have discussed, the logical repairs to your system given the <br /> current condition would be to expand lengthwise towards the road, and <br /> replace the rock bed in the existing mound. The intent of this would <br /> be to increase the amount of absorption area and the size of the rock <br /> bed so that the daily discharge to each square foot of rock bed will <br /> decrease. Additionally, replacement of the rock and removal of the <br /> accumulated biomat at the rock sand interface will hopeful ly give the <br /> system a clean start in biomat formation. <br /> Your septic contractor should meet with the Septic Inspector, Steve <br /> Weckman, to establish the parameters for these repairs. I want to <br /> reiterate that by allowing the repairs as described above, the City is <br /> in no way guaranteeing that the repairs will accomplish their intended <br /> purpose, but we feel that you would be taking the most logical steps <br /> from a technical and economic standpoint to solve this system problem. <br /> If the proposed repairs fail to yield a system that does not discharge <br /> to the surface, additional solutions would have to be considered. <br /> Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> � <br /> ���� <br /> � <br /> MICHAEL P. GAFFRON <br /> Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator <br /> MPG/ch <br /> cc: Steve Weckman, Septic Inspector <br />