My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-11-2017 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2017
>
09-11-2017 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/27/2017 4:40:16 PM
Creation date
9/27/2017 4:40:14 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday, September 11,207 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> 15. #17-3963 JHG PROPERTIES,LLC,4035 DAHL ROAD,PRELIMINARY PLAT, <br /> VARIANCES,CONSERVATION DESIGN WAIVER—Continued <br /> and enjoyment of a substantial property right of applicant. This is necessary so the full potential and use <br /> could be realized. Gilbert indicated he has the same economic considerations that applied to the <br /> Wildhurst case. <br /> Gilbert stated another error in Staff's report is that the granting of the variance will alter the essential <br /> character of the neighborhood. As a matter of law,an area variance does not alter the essential character <br /> of the locality. Gilbert stated two of the three principles under the state statute have been met and that in <br /> his view the principles applied in the Wildhurst decision are the same principles that should be applied to <br /> his application. <br /> The third element for consideration is use of the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the <br /> zoning. Staff has basically stated you cannot have a variance because you need a variance. In the <br /> Wildhurst case,the findings said that the application was generally consistent and in harmony with the <br /> ordinance. Gilbert indicated he has looked at the 18 homes in the area and nine of those homes are less <br /> than one acre. Gilbert stated in his view his proposal is in harmony with the neighborhood and single- <br /> family residential use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and is similar to the findings used in the <br /> Wildhurst case. <br /> Finally,the plight of the landowner is unique to the property and not created by the landowner. Gilbert <br /> stated Staff basically told him he paid a high price for the property. Gilbert indicated he purchased the <br /> property over the Internet and bought it as is because he thought it was important to preserve his <br /> neighborhood and add value to the neighborhood and the City. <br /> Gilbert stated this property is unique since it is high on a hill with a wetland on the west side. It is a long, <br /> rectangular lot. Gilbert stated if he is limited to one lot,the only place to construct a house is on the hill <br /> and the front yard would basically be like a football field. <br /> Gilbert requested the City Council apply the same variance principles that were used on the setback <br /> requirements in the Wildhurst case in his density request. The Court of Appeals has said the decision <br /> should be made on the evidence as presented. Gilbert stated when the City Council looks at the judgment <br /> of the facts,he has met all the statutory requirements and his request is almost identical to what was done <br /> on Wildhurst. <br /> Gilbert noted he is also asking for a waiver to the conservation design since they will be leaving all the <br /> trees there. Gilbert indicated he would like the border of trees to stay there for privacy. <br /> Dankey asked if he originally planned to construct one house on the property when he purchased it, <br /> especially since he has resided in Orono for 35-plus years and is familiar with some of the City's rules <br /> and regulations. <br /> Gilbert stated his main concern was that another trailer home would be put on this property and that he <br /> wanted to preserve his neighborhood. Gilbert stated he is attempting to make the best use of the property <br /> they can. Due to the price of the property and the cost to construct a house, it would be well above the <br /> valuation of other nonlakeshore properties in the area. <br /> Page 8 of 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.