Laserfiche WebLink
���p CITY OF ORONO <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> � <br /> �� �,� No. � 7 � � <br /> lqkFS H O�'�c. <br /> story deck located on the lake side of the house; a deck is not part of the new home <br /> application, although a grade-level patio similar to the existing patio is proposed. <br /> A9. A variance application was submitted in 2016 for addition of a second story above the <br /> existing garage. Prior to Planning Commission review, that application was put on hold <br /> (later withdrawn)when the Applicants and their builder concluded that drainage issues for <br /> the existing house could not be resolved through remodeling. The current application, for <br /> replacement of the existing house and garage in the same location as the existing,resolves <br /> the drainage issues, and accomplishes the desired added living space, within virtually the <br /> same footprint as the existing home. <br /> A10. The new home with a full story above the garage will increase the livability of the property <br /> while not increasing hardcover, and structural coverage is well below the limit for this site. <br /> The close proximity to the lakeshore as well as the substandard setback to the street are <br /> clearly a function of the lack of lot depth from the street to the lake,and this factor is shared <br /> by the two adjacent homes to the immediate south. <br /> A 11. Applicants intend to save the existing trees on the lake side of the property,which provides <br /> buffering of the fa�ade as viewed from the lake. The house across the street sits <br /> significantly higher than Applicants' house, so that lake views enjoyed by that off-lake <br /> owner(views which are not protected by code)will be minimally affected. <br /> Al2. In considering this application for variances, the Council has considered the advice and <br /> recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed variances <br /> upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic <br /> conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values <br /> of property in the surrounding area. <br /> VARIANCE ANALYSIS: <br /> B1. "Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes <br /> and intent of the ordinance . . . ." Single family residences are a per»ritted use within the <br /> LR-1 C zoning distric� <br /> B2. "Variances shall only be permitted... when the variances are consistent with the <br /> comprehensive plan." The proposed residential principal structure is a residential use <br /> which is consistent with the comprehensive plan guiding of this and surrounding <br /> properties for residential use. <br /> B3. "Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there aze <br /> practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. `Practical difficulties,' as used <br /> in connection with the granting of a variance,means that: <br /> i. The property owner in question proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner, <br /> however,the proposed use is not permitted by the official controls." <br /> Page 3 of 6 <br />