My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Res 6788
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
C
>
Casco Circle
>
3155 Casco Circle - 20-117-23-43-0027
>
Resolutions
>
Res 6788
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 4:00:53 PM
Creation date
9/26/2017 12:57:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
3155
Street Name
Casco
Street Type
Circle
Address
3155 Casco Circle
Document Type
Resolutions
PIN
2011723430027
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
��Np CITY OF ORONO <br /> RESOLUTION OF TI-IE CITY COUNCIL <br /> s� `� No. 6 7 8 3 <br /> ��KES H 0�� <br /> mentioned meetings, and any and all other materials distributed at these meetings are <br /> hereby incorporated by reference. <br /> 2. The Property is located in the LR-1 C Zoning District. <br /> 3. The Property contains 0.69 acres in area and has a defined lot width of 130 feet at the <br /> OHWL and 123 feet at the 75 feet. <br /> 4. The Property is within Tier 1 and hardcover is limited to 25% according to the Stormwater <br /> Quality Overlay District. <br /> 5. Applicant has applied for the following variance: <br /> a. Lake yard setback variance for retaining walls <br /> 6. In considering this application for variance, the Council has considered the advice and <br /> recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed variance <br /> upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic <br /> conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values <br /> of property in the surrounding area. <br /> ANALYSIS: <br /> 1. "Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes <br /> and intent of the ordinance . . . ." Granting the lake setback variance to allow the <br /> improvements to be constructed within 75 feet of the OHWL is for the purpose of <br /> preserving and protecting the existing slope in the lake yard and will likely not alter the <br /> essential character of the locality. <br /> 2. "Variances shall only be permitted . . . when the variances are consistent with the <br /> comprehensive plan."Granting the requested variance to permit additional structure within <br /> the 75-foot setback resulting from the retaining walls is consistent with the priorities <br /> outlined in the comprehensive plan to protect lakeshore. Screening of the walls from the <br /> lake will be a mitigating condition of approval of the variances, which is supported by the <br /> comprehensive plan. <br /> 3. "Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are <br /> practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. `Practical difficulties,' as used in <br /> connection with the granting of a variance, means that: <br /> a. The property owner in question proposes to use fhe prope►ty in a reasonab/e manner, <br /> however, the proposed use is not pem►itted by the official contmis. <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.