My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
complaints/violations/court
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
N
>
Navarre Lane
>
3300 Navarre Lane - 17-117-23-44-0098
>
Correspondence
>
complaints/violations/court
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 3:45:37 PM
Creation date
8/7/2017 1:12:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
3300
Street Name
Navarre
Street Type
Lane
Address
3300 Navarre Lane
Document Type
Correspondence
PIN
1711723440098
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
33 no ov,4 v�rc� (�-n�. <br /> RFcF�V�O <br /> KENNETH N. POTTS, P.A. 5101 Thimsen Avenue <br /> MqR o <br /> Attorney at Law Suite 200 C�TY F S 2p�6 <br /> MINNETONKA,MINNESOTA 5534� ORO <br /> TELEPHONE(952)474-4240 �Q <br /> TELECOPIER(952)474-0987 <br /> March 2, 2006 <br /> Mr. Greg Keller <br /> Attorney at Law <br /> 351 Second Street <br /> Excelsior,MN 55331 • <br /> RE: State v. Michael John Swanson <br /> Dear Mr. Keller: <br /> I did have the opportunity to speak to Lyle Oman, the building official with the <br /> City of Orono in regard to your client. Mr. Oman indicates that things are "quiet" now <br /> because Mr. Swanson's business is primarily that of seal coating and seasonal dock <br /> maintenance and installation. Mr. Oman reminded me that Melanie Curtis previously had <br /> contacted Mr. Swanson who told Ms. Curtis that he understood the City's position on the <br /> illegal home occupation but will continue to operate it as has been and will continue to <br /> bring commercial equipment to his residential property as he sees fit. <br /> Therefore, as you can imagine, Mr. Oman doesn't feel that your client has been <br /> very accommodating and will continue to run his business and disturb the peace and quiet <br /> of the neighborhood. While I understand your position that you do not believe that the <br /> ordinance is very well drafted I think it is clear that he is violating both the letter and <br /> spirit of it by continuing to run a business, particularly with heavy equipment, wherein a <br /> number of times he starts his business at 6:00 a.m. in tl�e morning which quite obviously <br /> would disturb the neighbors. <br /> I have charged him with a Petty Misdemeanor; however, he was in violation for <br /> approximately 45 days. I would be requesting that he plead guilty with a substantial <br /> amount of the fine being stayed on the condition that he not engage in a prohibited <br /> occupation in the next year. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.