My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Wetland Classification/Identification/Delineation-2011
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
M
>
Myrtlewood Road
>
25 Myrtlewood Road - 36-118-23-33-0014
>
Misc
>
Wetland Classification/Identification/Delineation-2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 5:03:19 PM
Creation date
8/1/2017 1:35:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
25
Street Name
Myrtlewood
Street Type
Road
Address
25 Myrtlewood Road
Document Type
Misc
PIN
3611823330014
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM- Midwest Region <br /> ProjecUSite 25 Myrtlewood Rd. City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: 11-22-11 <br /> � ApplicanUOwner. STEVEN J RYAN&ANNE E RYAN State: MN 3ampling Point: 1-1 WET <br /> Investigator(s): BKB tection,Township, Range: Sec. 36,T118N, R23W <br /> Landform(hillsiope,terrace,etc.): flat Local relief(concave,convex, none): none <br /> � Slope(%): 1 Lat: 44.9786 Long: 93.5403 Datum: NAD 83 <br /> Soil Map Unit Name Houghton and Muskego soils,depressional �WI Classification: PEMF <br /> ; Are climatiGhydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no,explain in remarks) <br /> ' Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances" <br /> Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes <br /> � SUMMARY OF FINDINGS pf needed,explain any answers in remarks.) <br /> , Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y <br /> Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetlar Y <br /> � Wetland hydrology present? Y yes,optional wetland site ID: <br /> Remarks:(Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) <br /> : , <br /> I <br /> { VEGETATION-- Use scientific names of plants. <br /> Absolute t Indicator pominance Test Worksheet <br /> l Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius ) %Cover Species Staus Number of Dominant Species <br /> � 1 Quercus rubra 20 Y FACU that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 4 (A) <br /> ; <br /> 2 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 5 Y FACW Total Number of Dominarrt <br /> � <br /> g Species Across all Strata: 5 (B) <br /> � 4 Percent of Dominant Speaes <br /> 5 that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 80.00% (A/B) <br /> 25 =Total Cover <br /> i Saplinq/Shrub stratun (Plot size: 15 ft radius ) Prevalence Index Worksheet <br /> 1 Rhamnus cathartica 10 Y FAC Total%Cover of: <br /> 2 OBL species 30 x 1 = 30 <br /> � 3 FACW species 40 x 2= 80 <br /> j 4 FAC species 10 x 3= 30 <br /> � 5 FACU species 20 x 4= SO <br /> 10 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 <br /> I Herb stratum (Plot size: 1 m radius ) Column totals 100 (A) 220 (B) <br /> 1 Phalaris arondinacea 35 Y FACW Prevalence Index=B/A= 2.20 <br /> 2 Typha angustifolia 30 Y OBL <br /> : ; 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: <br /> I 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation <br /> � <br /> ` 5 X Dominance test is>50% <br /> g X Prevalence index is 53.0" <br /> ' � — <br /> � 7 Morphogical adaptations'(provide <br /> _.. 8 supporting data in Remarics or on a <br /> g separate sheet) <br /> i 1p Problematic hydrophytic vegetation' <br /> ! 65 =Total Cover (explain) <br /> � <br /> � Woodv vine stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius ) �Indicators of hydric sal and weUand hydrolagy must be <br /> � present,unless disturbed or proWematic <br /> ' Z y rop c <br /> i <br /> 0 =Total Cover vegetation <br /> present? Y <br /> i Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) <br /> ...� <br /> ,._) <br /> US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region <br /> '� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.