My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
#6712-variance-2016
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
M
>
Mooney Lake Drive (Formeraly 300 Sixth Ave N)
>
1050 Mooney Lake Drive - 25-118-23-41-0013
>
Resolutions
>
#6712-variance-2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 4:15:02 PM
Creation date
7/31/2017 8:09:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
1050
Street Name
Mooney Lake
Street Type
Drive
Address
1050 Mooney Lake Drive
Document Type
Resolutions
PIN
2511823410013
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
, <br /> ���o CITY OF ORONO <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> ��1' ��G�� No. � 7 1 2 <br /> kESH� <br /> A 10. The solution to avoid the need for individual variances resulting from the timing and <br /> location of each successive house construction is to grant a blanket variance, establishing <br /> conditions of approval that will ensure an appropriate review process in the event of a <br /> potential view encroachment. Subject to appropriate conditions,the granting of an average <br /> lakeshore setback variance for each of the Lots will meet the intent and spirit of the <br /> Ordinance while avoiding the need for individual Lot owners to apply for a variance for a <br /> newly platted Lot. <br /> A11. In considering this application for variance, the Council has considered the advice and <br /> recoxnmendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed variances <br /> upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic <br /> conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values <br /> of property in the surrounding area. <br /> VARIANCE ANALYSIS: <br /> According to MN §462.537 Subd. 6(2) variances sha11 only be pernutted when the following <br /> standards are sadsfied(findings applicable to a117 Lots are in bold text): <br /> B 1. The variance is in hannony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. Single <br /> family homes and the associated amenities are permitted uses in the RR 1B distric�'�he <br /> average lakeshore setback ordinance is intended to protect neighboring properties' <br /> views of the lake. Granting of the variances with conditions will maintain those views. <br /> B2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. Granting of the variance with <br /> conditions will be consistent with the intent of the comprehensive plan to protect lake <br /> views. <br /> B3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties: <br /> a. The property owners propose to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the <br /> official controls. The Lot owners are proposing to use their properties in a reasonable <br /> manner by constructing new homes in a configuration wluch while not strictly meeting <br /> the provisions of the ordinance will effectively meet the intent of the ordinance. <br /> b. There are circumstances unique to the properties not created by the landowners. The varied <br /> topography, requirements for tree preservation, and the location of weflands, <br /> stormwater ponds, septic sites, and driveways are unique factors to this subdivision <br /> wluch result in the limited possibilities for placement of homes within each Lot None <br /> of these factors were created by the Lot owners. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.