Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 23, 2015 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />  <br />Page 3 of 18  <br />  <br />(5. #14-3690 FRED JOHNSON (CD PURCHASER), PATRICIA PFEFFER (SELLER), 1565 <br />ORCHARD BEACH PLACE continued) <br /> <br />Gaffron noted in Staff’s report there is some discussion about the acreage numbers that were reported at <br />the last meeting, which has to do with 0.18 acres versus 0.22 acre. Gaffron indicated that for consistency <br />the same source of data - Hennepin tax records - was used for all of the lots along the shoreline to make <br />sure that Staff treats it consistently and fairly based on the data used. <br /> <br />Staff is suggesting that the development of this property with a single-family residence would have <br />negative impacts on the character of the neighborhood, negative environmental impacts, and would not be <br />in keeping with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />Staff continues to recommend denial of the lot area and width variances, the side street and rear setback <br />variance, the average lakeshore setback variance, and a conditional use permit and variance for grading, <br />excavation and fill within the 0-75 foot zone. Gaffron stated if the Council chooses to grant certain <br />variances to allow for some limited level of development on the property, Staff would request clear <br />direction establishing parameters for that development. <br /> <br />Gaffron displayed a sketch of the property and noted the rear of the proposed house would be located 12.8 <br />feet from the rear lot line. <br /> <br />The City Council had no questions for Staff. <br /> <br />Todd Haugan, Attorney-at-Law on behalf of the applicants, stated the only thing that is new is the color <br />rendering, which shows that the house they are proposing to construct on the property is not going to <br />significantly alter the ability of the neighbors to see the lake. Haugan noted there are 85-foot trees on the <br />lot that are clearly higher than the building they are proposing. <br /> <br />Haugan stated the Council took their request under advisement before. Haugan stated it is a lot that had a <br />house until 1973 or something like that. The house was dilapidated and torn down at that time. There <br />was also a garage on the property. Haugan stated they are asking for the variances, the most prominent of <br />which is the sight line variance, which requires a 140-foot setback. Haugan noted the lot is only 100 feet <br />deep and is roughly 10,000 square feet. <br /> <br />Haugan stated if the Council does not grant the variances so this modest house can be built, they will be <br />rendering the property absolutely useless for anything, which means, in effect, that the City has taken <br />it. Haugan stated they either want the permit to be issued by the City or have the City purchase the lot. <br />Haugan noted they will take this matter to court and the court will either grant the variances or make the <br />City purchase the property. <br /> <br />Haugan stated they would like to construct a modest house and that in his view it fits in the neighborhood, <br />there was a house there at one time, and if not granted, they would request the City purchase the lot. <br /> <br />McMillan noted the City has received some letters opposing the project from some of the neighbors. <br /> <br />Council Member Printup noted the last two times this was before the City Council there was quite a bit of <br />discussion, but that there has not been much new information submitted besides the color rendering.