My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-09-2015 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2015
>
03-09-2015 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/30/2015 1:14:58 PM
Creation date
4/30/2015 1:14:06 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 9, 2015 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 31 of 43 <br /> <br />(12. #15-3708 CITY OF ORONO – AMEND ZONING CODE SECTION 78-1405(A)(8) – <br />STANDARDS FOR FENCES AS A NON-ENCROACHMENT, continued) <br /> <br /> <br />In measuring fence height, a question that was originally posed was what should be considered the top of <br />the fence. The amendment as initially drafted indicated that height should be measured from the top of <br />any part of the fence, including vertical structural supports, lattice, ornate top design elements, and so <br />forth. It was noted that a 6-foot screening fence with decorative post finials extending above it would <br />technically be out of compliance with this. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission concluded that limited finials above the top of the fence would be appropriate. <br />The result is an exclusion of post finials from being considered as part of the fence, plus proposed text <br />that states as follows: “Exception: post finials extending above the top of the fence shall not exceed 10 <br />inches in width per finial and shall not extend above the top of the fence by more than 0 percent of the <br />allowed maximum fence height at that location. A 6-foot fence would be allowed a 7-inchy finial above <br />the top of the fence and a 42-inch fence would be allowed a 4-inch finial.” <br /> <br />As it relates to the average fence setback, existing code indicates a different way of defining the average <br />lakeshore setback line for fences than it does for other structures. The Planning Commission felt the <br />current terminology creates confusion and the line being defined for fences should not be called the <br />average lakeshore setback line. Staff is in agreement with that and the Planning Commission <br />recommended that term be removed. <br /> <br />The language now reads as follows: “Fences within the required side yard of a lakeshore lot shall not <br />exceed six feet in height, and shall not exceed 42 inches in height for any portion located lakeward of a <br />line drawn between the most lakeward projection of the fence owner’s principal residence structure and <br />the most lakeward projection of the principal residence structure on the adjacent property abutting the <br />side yard in which the fence is located. <br /> <br />As it relates to non-standard lakeshore lots, the following text is proposed: “When the building site of a <br />lakeshore lot is separated from the lakeshore by a public or private road, the following definitions will <br />apply for fence location purposes subject to the provisions of Section 78-1405(a)(8) a.2: When the yard <br />on the opposite side of the building site from the lake does not abut a street, such yard shall be considered <br />as a standard rear yard. The yard between the building site and the street shall be considered as a standard <br />front yard.” <br /> <br />The Planning Commission also recommended the following additional text to Subsection E, fence <br />construction and maintenance: “Fencing materials shall consist of permanent all-weather products. <br />Temporary fencing improvements, which normally consist of materials such as snow fencing, silt fence, <br />bio-retention logs or other types of products normally associated with construction projects, shall not be <br />allowed to remain on the property following final inspection, or issuance of a Certificate of Occupany for <br />a permitted construction project, or protection of property during a similar project or winter conditions. <br />Such temporary fencing materials shall not be allowed to remain on a permanent basis on a parcel.” <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.