Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 9, 2015 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />  <br />Page 17 of 43  <br />  <br />(9. #14-3687 REAL ASSETS II, LLC 3720 – 3730 NORTHERN AVENUE – PLAT OF <br />NORTHERN OAKS, continued) <br /> <br />Gaffron indicated it would change one sentence in the development agreement and would not require a <br />resolution. Gaffron stated Council action would be needed to amend the development agreement. <br /> <br />Mattick stated he is in agreement with that. Typically the City will allow grading, but when Staff <br />measures height, it is based on what the previous grade is. In a situation like this, the City does have <br />some flexibility with those standards, which is why it is not a variance situation. <br /> <br />McMillan noted the City has had some issues in the past with artificially creating grades and that she is <br />protective of that. McMillan stated in her view if someone creates too high of a grade around the house, it <br />can create faster runoff, which is something to consider. <br /> <br />McMillan stated she does not particularly believe that someone needs two stories to sell a house and that a <br />variety of homes is good for a community. McMillan stated in her view it is important to go with what <br />offers long-term value for Orono, which is a variety of housing. McMillan stated she understands the <br />developer’s point of view is what is selling now but that she is looking at the long-term appreciation for <br />Orono, which is to have a variety of housing. McMillan stated the homes could be sold to someone that <br />does not require four bedrooms. <br /> <br />Levang stated she specifically remembers George Stickney telling the Council that these would be smaller <br />homes for people who are downsizing and that a variety of modest homes were what the Council agreed <br />to. Levang stated she does not want to set a precedent and that the Council needs to be mindful of the <br />grading. <br /> <br />Todd Holmers pointed out the two lots in the center will be lower than the other homes and will not be <br />any taller than any of the other ones. <br /> <br />Levang indicated she did visit the site earlier today and that it is considerably lower in that area but that <br />everyone knew that it would be. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated based on the analysis by Staff for Lot 3, even with the proposed grades, the lowest level <br />would still be considered a story with 9-foot ceilings. Gaffron stated if a plan is submitted showing Lots <br />3 and 4 with an 8-foot basement based on the pre-existing proposed grades, then the City would only need <br />to make a slight change to the development agreement. If that does not work and they still have an issue <br />with the lowest story not being considered a basement, then it becomes a variance situation and a separate <br />application. Gaffron noted the City normally does not grant height variances. <br /> <br />McMillan noted the City also tends to avoid variances on new development. <br /> <br />Gronberg stated in the past they have gone off the grading plan for other subdivisions. Gronberg asked <br />how this can be avoided in the future