Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 9, 2015 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />  <br />Page 14 of 43  <br />  <br />(9. #14-3687 REAL ASSETS II, LLC 3720 – 3730 NORTHERN AVENUE – PLAT OF <br />NORTHERN OAKS, continued) <br /> <br />Walsh asked whether the City has a hard and fast rule that prohibits the grade from being changed if it <br />does not have a negative impact on the neighborhood. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated depending on how much grading the person is doing, it could require a conditional use <br />permit. Gaffron stated Staff could approve it administratively if the grading is just associated with the <br />one house, is less than 500 cubic yards, and is not artificially changing the grade so the person is creating <br />a basement out of a story <br /> <br />Walsh asked what would happen if they are changing it from a basement to a walkout. <br /> <br />Gaffron indicated a conditional use permit would likely be required. <br /> <br />Mark Gronberg, Surveyor, stated he and the developer worked very hard with City Staff and the <br />Watershed District to achieve the correct drainage on the site. Gronberg stated they submitted a plan with <br />proposed grades that had Lots 3 and 4 built up a little because they had to get the water off to the two <br />sides. There was not enough room to put a pond or a stormwater area in the middle due to the way the <br />wetland bows in. <br /> <br />Gronberg stated he was surprised when he saw the resolution and had he been part of the discussion <br />regarding the final resolution, he would have objected because it was based on existing grades. Gronberg <br />indicated the resolution did not meet the intent of the whole grading plan of the Watershed District and <br />the City Engineers. Gronberg stated they can still meet the approved grading plan for these homes and <br />that in other developments they have worked off the approved grading plan. <br /> <br />McMillan asked how many feet they would like to stack against the homes. <br /> <br />Gronberg stated the original grading plan depicted just boxes, and that when they come in with a <br />proposed house, there are sometimes minor changes to the plan. Gronberg noted they did not have to <br />change it much from the approved grading plan. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated the biggest changes were in between these two lots and on other side of Lots 3 and 4. <br /> <br />McMillan asked if what the Council is being shown is the final plat grading plan. <br /> <br />Gaffron indicated it is. Gaffron stated what Mr. Gronberg has provided is showing where there is more <br />pronounced drainage between the homes, deeper ditches, and a little more fill in the front than what was <br />there previously. Gaffron stated there is enough of a change that if you add another foot or two of fill; <br />those stories would go back to being basements. <br /> <br />Gronberg stated to his knowledge nothing changed by more than a foot or a foot and a half. Gronberg <br />stated most of that is based on having definite house plans. <br /> <br />Walsh asked if he saw this as more of a design/build process.