Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 9, 2015 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />  <br />Page 10 of 43  <br />  <br /> <br />*7. #13-3623 LIN YAN/CITY OF ORONO – 1330 CHERRY PLACE – CORRECTED <br />RESOLUTION, RESOLUTION NO. <br /> <br />Levang moved, Cornick seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. , a Corrective Resolution of the <br />City Council for the property located at 1330 Cherry Place. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br /> <br />8. #14-3685 WILLI ABBOTT ON BEHALF OF THE BROADWAY GROUP, LLC <br /> <br />Gaffron stated the applicant is requesting an amendment of the Development Contract and RPUD <br />Agreement for Oliver Hill to revise the limits on lot coverage for two of the seven lots. <br /> <br />Oliver Hill had a lot coverage limit of 15 percent per lot, which is lot coverage by structures. The <br />developer initially had proposed to build fairly modest homes ranging from 1,800 to 2,200 square foot. <br />Staff recently received a house plan for Lot 2, Block 2. Lot 2, Block 2 has a limit of 15 percent structural <br />coverage. The house plan came in with a footprint of approximately 4,000 square feet or 22 percent lot <br />coverage. Gaffron stated clearly that house does not fit the lot. <br /> <br />The developer is still in the process of constructing the road and they have not constructed any homes at <br />this point. The applicants have asked whether they could exchange lot coverage for Lot 2, Block 2 with <br />Lot 2, Block 1, which is directly across from Lot 2, Block 2. Gaffron indicated Lot 2, Block 2, is a good <br />sized lot but is small compared to the rest of the lots in the neighborhood. The lot consists of <br />approximately 17,917 square feet and the lot across the street is almost 3,000 square feet. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated lot coverage has always been a massing issue and that the 15 percent is based on the entire <br />lot and not just the dry buildable land. The applicant has raised the question of whether it would be <br />feasible to exchange the amount of lot coverage that is allotted to the lot to the north for the smaller 15 <br />percent lot coverage for Lot 2 to the south. <br /> <br />During the application process, the applicant indicated his intent was to build modestly sized homes, and <br />the conceptual footprints shown on the approved development plans had no footprint larger than 2,200 <br />square feet. The issue for the Council to consider is whether it is reasonable to allow the transfer of <br />unusable excess lot coverage allotment from one lot to another lot. Gaffron noted that has not been done <br />previously. From Staff’s perspective, allowing 22 percent structural coverage would be way out of <br />proportion to the 15 percent structural lot coverage. Gaffron stated Staff remains neutral on whether it is <br />appropriate to swap the lot coverage. <br /> <br />Willi Abbott, The Broadway Group, stated he would like to raise a couple of points. Abbott stated it is <br />his belief that he made a mistake and missed that lot when calculating the 15 percent on each lot. In <br />addition, the lot lines were moved further back in order to meet the changed setback. Abbott stated when <br />they were calculating the 15 percent initially; they knew that Lot 2, Block 2, was going to be tight but that <br />they did not realize it would be that tight. <br /> <br />Abbott stated they originally set out to do 2,100 to 3,000 square foot homes. Abbott stated if you look at <br />the homes drawn on the survey, those were put on there by the surveyor to give an idea of where the <br />homes might go rather than the actual square footages.