Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,June 26,2017 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> 16. #16-3883 KEVIN ANDERSON/JAMES FRANZEL,800 NORTH ARM DRIVE, <br /> PRELIMINARY PLAT—RESOLUTION NO.6774—Continued <br /> Walsh noted Staff's report says the average lakeshore setback will be per the conceptual building setbacks <br /> as shown. Walsh asked if the building pad for Lot 3 would be a different building pad than what is shown <br /> as the existing building pad. <br /> Barnhart stated the average lakeshore setback would be identified and that the conceptual building pad <br /> would be out of the 75-foot zone by the two feet that the current house encroaches. <br /> Kevin Anderson,Applicant, stated the only item that was not discussed was the easement that was created <br /> for the utility company. Anderson stated by moving the property lot,the utility company can go through <br /> that area via the driveway on one of the lots. Anderson stated moving the line was to increase visibility <br /> and to provide the easement. <br /> Franzel noted it would put the easement along the property line,which would be the most reasonable use <br /> of the land rather than having it cut significantly through Lot 1. <br /> Barnhart pointed out the location of the easement and noted that shifting the green line over would require <br /> a new easement. Barnhart noted a standard plat typically shows easements along the property lines. <br /> Anderson stated if they move the easement up and then have the easement follow the property line to <br /> create a 140-foot wide lot,they would create a situation where there would be a very sharp turn. <br /> Bamhart stated Staff feels the line can be moved over relatively easily and that Staff is attempting to <br /> preserve the 140-foot width. Barnhart noted there are two easements,with one of the easements <br /> following the property line and the other easement providing access to the lift station. <br /> Anderson noted there currently is no easement for the lift station. <br /> Barnhart stated the lift station does impede the use and enjoyment of the property and that Staff is <br /> attempting to minimize that as much as possible. <br /> Walsh asked whether the applicant is okay with relocating the building pad for Lot 3 out of the 75-foot <br /> zone. <br /> Anderson stated if the house is torn down,there would be enough room to relocate the building pad two <br /> feet so it is out of the 75-foot zone. <br /> Crosby asked if there is anything on Lot 1 currently. <br /> Anderson indicated there is not. Anderson stated the Planning Commission had recommended the <br /> proposed building pad on Lot 1 be moved to the south,which has been done. Anderson asked whether <br /> the City Council would be willing to grant the lot width variance. <br /> Walsh stated that appears to be the only issue and that it would seem more logical to square up the lot as <br /> the applicant has proposed. <br /> Page 7 of 12 <br />