|
`�
<br /> � ,
<br /> . . �i. , , .� � 4 ,�y� '�I_Jij'1 -
<br /> .u�. . . � . . . ..:'i..?A. . . . � . ... . � .!t.�n°Y�.., r-%f [n-�Y�`?sY_.�n�t:�siay���}�!;
<br /> . " _ �wv �[�ib. !
<br /> ",� � . _ � • *`"qy yi�th +- �
<br /> �'�a t _ „` X t�`. i
<br /> R 'n� y�
<br /> , :�a � � a: ++''`.a:.*.
<br /> •`,"fi ; ,,,y. , ' + ��.4,
<br /> ':;�'. �' ��.,� • ""� ;''�,s�"`�.
<br /> 1.:�s:.• _ �a„Ya W,�
<br /> �. ��t tot Junt 10, 1986. Subs�qn�ntly, tht psostcution Mas " =��'��
<br /> �',- :^� ' �'
<br /> �`�,., , disAiaa�d by th• pros�cutor upon consultation and aqsrement ,. .,�t,�4'rf��#
<br /> ��j,' . .. '_ . w . .. - - � .•- 1 � . �tjYj�i�C.r
<br /> �: ` witb tht City �ta�! ehat iucc�s�t �2 proa�cution o! th� maeti�r � ;�.
<br /> �.�. �. , _ .
<br /> ',�w would not •ltotd th� City a r�m�dy thiti wouid caus• Mr. H�nk� ' f`�"� �
<br /> ,�,� . ;� ,
<br /> x
<br /> ��,}:, " '��'� :��,
<br /> ' ' to �ak• tAt s�psisa. Th�c�tor�, th• Ciey haa che��n ;!o pus��• ,'; ��``�`��`rs
<br /> ', � :�" �
<br /> a�J:� � � :i �
<br /> :�.� condtmnation o! tho hou�A a• provided !or in tJBC/89C S�ation ir��
<br /> "� {�.,
<br /> s
<br /> rR �. �� �. _ � _ �- - � � c x S
<br /> i-
<br /> �'a���� �,W�Q�• t r .- � a .�. �„ s .. �e,�'y �n+'��"�{E.� ¢�hA9,i a... . : F 'h .�:
<br /> �,,��+1c �` #t
<br /> �+t• y�,':=`:-���'n, i iC;�q i��. _�-'' ' Y�.� S ' '.�'� ��-t�a d.aS • � . � t+���!y�'r'"+
<br /> r@�s.iw�t4, `�'} •i �.� �,'�F���� . F, . . . . .�-x.::. � , = 8Y
<br /> ��
<br /> „t;
<br /> :4�
<br /> t�'r � ��` - ��.^�.Given�-�the� City's desire ��to �pratect the right, o! tbe - .. � ���� -
<br /> �� � ��� ' � , -�
<br /> �•:.
<br /> parties involved, the City requested a hearing before an . �
<br /> ,;,....
<br /> independent Administrative Law Judqe before movinq�forward. `�� �
<br /> ;�
<br /> Mr. Bruce Campbell, the ABministrative LaW Judqe, held a four � /"'.��
<br /> `�,
<br /> . . .:,:. ;
<br /> hour hearinq on Januery 30, 1987 and issued an opinion
<br /> reqardinq this matter on February 26, 1986. Judqe Campbell �.
<br /> ;
<br /> recommended that the City Cou^cil declare the conditional
<br /> - .c
<br /> Certilicate of Occupancy void and require the vacation o� the
<br /> structure aithin thirty days, unless Mr. Henke complied •�rith - =�
<br /> the OHC requirements relative to a secure foundation. Judge
<br /> �ampbell's Findings of Fact, Conclusions & Recommendation,
<br /> while not bindinq on the City, are instructive and supportive �.
<br /> o! the City's poaition thdt the Temporary Certificate of ��
<br /> Occup�ncy should be revoked and hazacdous buildinq proceedi.�gs
<br /> commenced.
<br /> (
<br /> �
<br /> After the issuance of the recommendation, Mr. Henke �
<br /> t
<br /> was qiven the opportunity to forward any exceptions he had to j
<br /> ►
<br /> the City. Mr. Henke's comments, attached hereto, set forth his �
<br /> s
<br /> �
<br /> �
<br /> �
<br /> - 5 f
<br /> � . �
<br /> �
<br />
|