My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-12-2017 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
06-12-2017 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/27/2017 11:11:57 AM
Creation date
6/27/2017 11:11:55 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,June 12,2017 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> 22. #17-3939 JOHN BAII,EY,2807 CASCO POINT ROAD,CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT— <br /> Continued <br /> Seals noted if this plan is not approved,the slope will remain as is and could potentially become worse. <br /> Crosby moved,Dankey seconded,to direct Staff to draft an approval resolution on Application No. <br /> 17-3939,John Bailey,2807 Casco Point Road,granting of a conditional use permit. VOTE: Ayes 5, <br /> Nays 0. <br /> 23. #17-3940 JASON AND ANALISE PETERSON,4105 HIGHWOOD ROAD,VARIANCES <br /> Curtis reviewed her Staff report dated June 12,2017. The applicants would like to construct a new home <br /> to the existing detached garage. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the application <br /> with the exception of the 2-foot side setback for the tiered decks. Staff recommends denial of the 2-foot <br /> side setback and denial of a lake setback variance to permit the tiered decks to encroach into the 75-foot <br /> lake setback. <br /> Printup asked why a variance is needed for the height. <br /> Curtis stated the height is measured at the highest existing adjacent grade to the mid-point of the peak, <br /> which is 32 feet. Curtis stated the new portion of the house, if it was not attached to the garage,would <br /> meet the height limitation of 30 feet,but attaching it brings it up to the 32 feet. As part of the original <br /> variance that approved the detached garage,the resolution made a stipulation that any future home <br /> connected to the garage would require a height variance due to the topography. <br /> Jason Peterson,Applicant, commented it is a challenging lot but the goal was to improve the lot by <br /> reducing the hardcover, improving the drainage, and enhancing the appearance of the house. The <br /> majority of the existing house is located within the 75-foot setback. Peterson stated the additional <br /> hardcover being requested is related to the square deck. Peterson noted they had originally proposed a <br /> triangle shaped deck that followed the setback line but the Planning Commission had recommended that <br /> the deck be made square so it would be more functional. <br /> Peterson indicated they tried working with the neighbor on the sightlines. On the southeast corner of the <br /> house,that was cut off an angle to help with the sightlines. Peterson noted there used to be a variance <br /> request for the east side but they have eliminated that to accommodate the neighbor. Peterson stated <br /> moving the house out of the 75-foot setback created somewhat of a hardship. <br /> Crosby asked if any of the deck will encroach into the 75-foot setback. <br /> Peterson indicated the deck will encroach into the 75-foot setback since it has now been squared off. <br /> Gary Germnudsen,4101 Highwood Road, stated his main concern relates to the 75-foot setback and the <br /> 15-foot setback. Germnudsen stated there basically will be a wall coming 30 feet straight up from the <br /> edge of the property line. Germnudsen indicated his house sits back 15 feet in that corner and that his <br /> sightline will be affected. The other three homes in that area are all behind the setback. Germnudsen <br /> stated if the applicant wanted to, since he is adding a 41-foot addition,he could go backwards and take <br /> ten feet off of the house or remove the deck. Germnudsen noted that would still leave the house within <br /> the 75-foot setback but it would be less of an encroachxnent. Germnudsen stated he doesn't want his view <br /> Page 12 of 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.