Laserfiche WebLink
MINU�'ES OF TSE <br /> QRONO CTTY C4UNCII,IV�E'1'II�TG <br /> Monday,�'ebrauy 8,2016 <br /> 7:D0 o'clock p.m. <br /> 10. #16-3802 TCO DESIGN,�380 SHADYWppD RpAD_REZONIlVG AND <br /> CONDITIONAL USE PER1VITr(cont�eued� <br /> M°M���if anyone frnm tlie public would like to comment on this application. <br /> Loren Fritz,3845 North Shore Driye,stated he moved to the community in 1968 and that his reason for <br /> carning toni$ht is that 1�noti,cad there was some activity goiAg on at this cor�er aad tha#he wanted to <br /> caanment that it is positive someone was considering movi.ng into this location, Fritz in�icated he wcwld <br /> be in support of something going in thene and th�at it would be�efit the Navan�e community, <br /> VOTE ON THE MOTION: Aye�4,Nays 1,Cornick Oppeaed. <br /> Mattick not�d the mativn was to d�ny the rezaning and that ther+e shoutd be another motion denying the <br /> conditionat use permit. <br /> Prjntnp moved,L�v�ng seconded,to deuy the txmditional uae permit reque�t by TCO I�aign for <br /> �380 Sh�dywood Road. VOTE: Aye�4,N�ya 1,Cornick Oppo�aed. <br /> 11. #�16�38U3 STONEWOUD,I.LC,ON BEHALF OF TASHITAA TUFAA,183Q <br /> ��dRELINE ROAD,VARIANCES AND CONDITIONAL U3E PERIVIIT <br /> C�rtis atated the applicant is proposing to<�onstruct a new hame rnn the subject property which eonsists of <br /> 1.6 acres in area, 133 fact in width,and is locatad within the LR-1A district. The applicant is requesting <br /> appnoval of lot area and lot width variaaces as well as a side si�t setback variance ia order to place the <br /> hvme 30 feet fi+om Heritage Lane where a 50-foot setback is normally required. A conditional use permit <br /> is also 1�inS requested to allow the exporE of appraxia�ately 2,000 cubic yards of fiIl matterial finm the <br /> m <br /> property as well as a variance to permit a 6-fioot tall open wrought iron style fence on the entire periineter <br /> of the prape,rty. The applicant is further�Nestin8 a�econd�urb cut. <br /> Since the Platuiing Commission mc�ting,the applieant h,as submitted a revised fence plan. T he fence is <br /> now propos�to stop near the sewer esseme�t on the property and has been pulled back from Shor+eline. <br /> The fencx is still proposed at six feet. <br /> �J��'Y 1���P�anning Commissian held a public hearing and reviewed the application. Following <br /> the public hearing the Planning C�mmis�ion voted 6-0 to recommend the following: <br /> 1. Denial of the f�ence height vatiance vvith the r�ocommendahon that the fence��Sign�; <br /> 2. Appmv�l of the lot width,lot area,and side st�eet setback variauoes; <br /> 3. A,ppraval of the condt�tional use permit subject to conditions. <br /> As noted within the memo,Staff recommends approval of the lot area,Iot width,and street setbao� <br /> variances as requestsd in conjunction with the�roposed Plan. Staffrecomm�nde denial of the v�rianee to <br /> permit eoastrtuYtion of the fence exceeding 42 inches in height. Regarding the ccuiditional tzs�permit, <br /> Staffreco�ends approval consistent wi�h the conditions necommended by the Planning Commissian as <br /> ou#lined in 3ta�s report. <br /> Page 15 of 32 <br />