Laserfiche WebLink
• (b) Required upgrade or replacement A sewage treatment system not meeting the requirements of Minnesota Rules <br /> ' Chapter 7080, as amended, or the requirements of this article, whichever is more restrictive, must be upgraded, at a <br /> minimum, at any time a building permit is required for any improvements on, or use of, the property, subject to the <br /> following: <br /> (1) Any such system for which the city has previously issued orders requiring upgrade or replacement of the system <br /> by December 31, 2007, shall not be subject to this requirement until January 1, 2008. <br /> (2) Any such system for which the city has previously issued orders requiring upgrade or replacement of the system <br /> by December 31, 2010, shall not be subject to this requirement until January 1, 2011. <br /> (3) Regardless whether previous upgrade or replacement orders have been issued, this upgrade or replacement <br /> requirement shall not apply when said building permit is for regular maintenance or upkeep including but not <br /> limited to replacement of inechanical equipment such as air conditioning, furnaces, water heaters, or water <br /> softeners, or for re-roofing, re-siding or window replacement. <br /> (c) Construction of additional bedrooms or construction including water-using appliances that will increase the sewage <br /> flow into an ISTS. A building permit shall not be issued until the city confirms that the existing ISTS is compliant and of <br /> adequate size to treat the sewage flow from the building and that a future drainfield site is designed and preserved. If <br /> the existing ISTS must be repaired or replaced, an ISTS design for both the existing ISTS and a future drainfield site <br /> must be approved before issuing a building permit. If expansion or replacement of the ISTS is required, the ISTS must <br /> be installed and inspected before a certificate of occupancy shatl be issued for the construction. Failure to identify <br /> satisfactory drainfield sites for the proposed sewage flow for use now as well as a future site shall result in the denial <br /> of the building permit application. <br /> (d) Expansion of an existing building, including decks and patios; construction of an accessory building, driveway or land <br /> alteration. A future drainfield site must be designed and presenred prior to the issuance of a building permit for any <br /> expansion of an existing building, construction to an accessory building or driveway or land alteration on a property <br /> using an ISTS. A building permit will not be issued when the proposed work would preclude the use of the only future <br /> drainfield site approved by the city. <br /> (Code 1984, § 12.30(4)(F); Ord.No. 100 2nd series, § 4, 2-10-1992; Ord. No. 147 2nd series, § 8, 5-13-1996; <br /> Ord. No. 199 2nd series, § 1(12.30(4)(F)), 5-8-2000; Ord.No. 38 3rd series, § l, 9-24-2007) <br /> From: Mike Johnsrud [mailto:mike@pcimidwest.or�] <br /> Sent:Thursday,August 11,2016 12:41 PM <br /> To: Roger Peitso<rpeitso@ci.orono.mn.us> <br /> Subject: 135 Luce Line Ridge <br /> Roger, <br /> I left you a voice message earlier. I am looking at purchasing 135 Luce Line Ridge in Orono. I would like to <br /> initially discuss putting up an accessory building. I have downloaded the application packet but I have some <br /> questions about your process. My initial questions are: <br /> 1. The lot is 2.68 acres. I wouldn't be building more than a 1200 sq. f�footprint. I believe the <br /> properly is a PRD. Can you please tell me what the setbacks would be? <br /> 2. Would you have exact placement/specifications on the existing septic system? If yes, would these <br /> available to me? <br /> a. Initially I would like to place the structure on the north/northwest corner of the existing <br /> driveway. <br /> 3. I've read that accessory buildings cannot be placed closer to the street than the house. This, along <br /> with whatever the side and rear setbacks are, may be difficult to do in that location. I want to hold <br /> to that; however, I do not know what the setbacks are. Would it possible/feasible to obtain a <br /> variance if it is necessary? <br /> 4 <br />