My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Re: sewer assessment
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
L
>
Loma Linda Avenue
>
1290 Loma Linda Avenue - 07-117-23-41-0089
>
Correspondence
>
Re: sewer assessment
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 5:37:44 PM
Creation date
6/6/2017 2:04:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
1290
Street Name
Loma Linda
Street Type
Avenue
Address
1290 Loma Linda Ave
Document Type
Correspondence
PIN
0711723410089
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
►��-�c�-c� a�� <br /> � <br /> POPHAM, HAIK, SCHNOBRICH, KAUFMAN & DOTY, . � } �� <br /> i <br /> MEMORANDUM <br /> TO: Michael P. Gaffron <br /> Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator <br /> FROM: Kathleen A. BlatZ <br /> City Attorney <br /> RE: City Policy Regarding Sewer Assessment and Connection <br /> Charge - 1290 Loma Linda Avenue <br /> DATE: April 13, 1987 <br /> Issue Presented <br /> You have inquired as to what would be a fair, <br /> reasonable, and legal sewer connection charge to collect when <br /> the property at 1290 Loma Linda Avenue is connected to the <br /> municipal sewer system. <br /> Conclusion <br /> Based upon the facts as presented, the proper and <br /> legal connection fee would be �225. 00, plus the actual cost of <br /> extending a stub to serve the property. <br /> Analysis <br /> The situation illustrates the problems that arise when <br /> the city' s connection charge does not represent the full and <br /> fair cost of construction. From a fairness point of view, the <br /> connection charge should reflect the original assessment plus <br /> �225 . 00 since that is what the other properties were charged. <br /> However, since the city did not assess this unit at the time of <br /> the original assessment, the city cannot now assess that <br /> property, without proceeding according to Chapter 429 of <br /> Minnesota Statutes. Given the lapse of time since the original <br /> assessment, it is doubtful whether the court would allow such a <br /> reassessment . <br /> The city, however, does not have to finance the cost <br /> of extending a 90-foot stub to serve the property. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.