My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-25-1985 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1985
>
11-25-1985 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/24/2015 2:41:39 PM
Creation date
4/24/2015 2:41:38 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 25, 1985. PAGE6 <br /> #986 ROVEGNO continued <br /> City Administrator Bernhardson understood and agreed with <br /> Attorney Blatz ' s opinion. <br /> Councilmember Grabek stated he was in favor of complete <br /> removal of the fence as soon as possible and applicant should <br /> have been ticketed for constructing the fence at the very <br /> beginning. He stated that it would be setting a precedent by <br /> approving the fence. <br /> Mayor Butler indicated her agreement with Councilmember <br /> Grabek. <br /> Councilmemb�r Adams believed through various interpre- <br /> tations that a 3-1/2 ' fence was legal, but if it is illegal, it <br /> should be removed. ' <br /> Councilmember Hammerel reflected Councilmember Adams <br /> previous misunderstanding that a 3-1/2 ' fence was legal, but <br /> was opposed to fences around the lake. <br /> Councilmember Frahm stated he did not like the fence but <br /> feels property owners have the right to prevent trespassing <br /> and damage to th�ir property. He felt that these problems <br /> and a solution should be addressed. He suggested <br /> consideration of the "opaque" fence. <br /> Zoning Administra�or Mabusth stated that she did suggest a <br /> fence to Mr. Rovegr�o to solve his trespassing problem. She <br /> noted that the intt:�nt was a 3-1/2 ' fence and not a "privacy" <br /> f ence. <br /> George Rovegno sta�.ed that he would be willing to take the <br /> fence down by the access. He noted that he is not interested <br /> in a variance or cc�nditional use permit, he just wants his <br /> privacy. He stated ���hat he will abide by any decision made by <br /> the Council and go from there, and that his intent was not to <br /> upset the neighbors. <br /> Councilmember Frahm stated that lack of privacy goes with <br /> that type of lakeshore property, but the trespassing on <br /> private property should be dealt with. <br /> It was moved by Councilmember Grabek, seconded by Mayor <br /> Butler, to require the fence and posts be removed completely <br /> by December 15th, 1985 . Motion, Ayes 4 , Nays 1. <br /> Councilmember Frahm voted nay stating he was in favor of a <br /> variance for a 3-1/2 ' opaque fence. <br /> It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by <br /> Councilmember Frahm, to instruct staff to work with <br /> applicant for an acceptable solution to his trespassing <br /> problem. Motion, Ayes 4 , Nays 1. Councilmember Grabek <br /> stated that too much expense and staff time has been spent <br /> already in this matter. <br /> For clarification, applicant was instructed to come up with <br /> an alternative solution and submit to staff. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.