Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 28 , 1985 . PAGE 4 <br /> Acting Mayor Frahm advised Asplund that after the patios are <br /> removed, that the ground should be sodded. <br /> Councilmember L. Adams noted that he has a problem approving <br /> anything in the 0-75 ' setback area. <br /> Councilmember L. Adams moved, Acting Mayor Frahm seconded, <br /> to adopt Resolution #1768 , A Resolution denying variances <br /> ' for the fence and patio concrete request with a deadline date <br /> for removal of patios for June 15 , 1985 , for 3424 Eastlake <br /> Street and July 23 , 1985 , for 3444 Eastlake Street and the <br /> request for deck platform and screened porch to be referred <br /> to the Planning Commission for their review. Motion, Ayes <br /> (2 ) , Nays (1 ) . <br /> Councilmember T. Adams voted nay. <br /> #897 CHUCR PETERSON <br /> 825 OLD LONG LARE ROAD <br /> PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION <br /> Chuck Peterson was present. Assistant Zoning Adminis- <br /> trator Gaf fron stated that the surveyor reconf irmed the dry <br /> buildable area that Council requested at the last meeting. <br /> Gaffron confirmed that there is 2 . 0 acres of dry buildable <br /> per lot in the area identified strictly as a seasonal <br /> drainageway. <br /> Councilmember T. Adams moved, Councilmember L. Adams <br /> seconded, to approve the preliminary subdivision <br /> application of Chuck Peterson. Motion, Ayes ( 3 ) , Nays ( 0 ) . <br /> #903 WARD FERRELL <br /> 3405 WATERTOWN ROAD <br /> ZONING APPEAL Mr. and Mrs. Ward Ferrell were present. Assistant Zoning <br /> Administrator Gaffron explained that the applicant was <br /> brought in under a zoning appeal in order to save the <br /> applicant some money. Gaffron explained that if the <br /> applicant had applied for a variance that the application <br /> would be more costly and with the Council ' s past precedents <br /> the Council would probably have denied the application. <br /> City Attorney Radio asked how much the full variance <br /> application would have cost. Radio noted that by allowing <br /> this applicant the appeals procedure the City is saving the <br /> applicant money, but by handling this matter the City is not <br /> treating this application as a variance and not using the <br /> same standards. Radio noted that the decision reached <br /> tonight does not presume that the same decision would be <br /> reached on a formal variance application. <br /> Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that the <br /> variance application would be $150 , plus the applicant ' s <br /> , expense for additional surveying work, plus the extra <br /> � , expensefor septic testing for each lot. Gaffron estimated <br />