Laserfiche WebLink
MI�]UTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELll APRIL 22, 1985 , l�T TFiE ORONO MZDDLE <br /> SCHOOL AUDITORIUM AT 685 OLD CRYSTAL 73AY ROAD - PAGE 13 <br /> Councilmember Grabek commented on the health hazard in the <br /> Crystal Bay area and that sewer is the best approach to <br /> solving the problems in the area. Grabek felt a <br /> responsibility to the City to order the sewer project. <br /> Mayor Butler read the proposed resolution ordering the <br /> sanitary sewer project for the Crystal Bay area. <br /> RESOLUTION #1747 <br /> Councilmember Grabek movec3 , Councilmember Frahm seconded , <br /> toadoptResolution #1747 , A Resolution Ordering Imprcvement <br /> and Awarding Contract for the Crystal Bay Sanitary Sewer <br /> Project 85-1. Motion, Ayes (5 ) , Nays ( 0 ) . <br /> Councilmember Grabek, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, to <br /> assess all project costs 100% to the benefitting Crystal Bay <br /> property owners for the proposed sewer improvements . The <br /> vote on the motion was delayed pending further discussion. <br /> Councilmember L. Adams stated some of the reasons he was in <br /> favor of the motion. Adams felt that no matter what option <br /> the Council chooses (50-75-100$ ) , in the long run the City is <br /> going to have to pick up a portion of the assessment because of <br /> the people who can defertheir assessment. Adams also noted <br /> that another part of the project will be picked up by the <br /> ger.eral tax payer because of the appeals process wherein the <br /> judge will decide what their assessment will be and the rest <br /> must be paid by the City. Adams explained that no matter <br /> what is decided tonight. the City will have to pick. up some of <br /> the cost through the general tax payer. <br /> Councilmember Frahm stated that his preliminaryfeeling was <br /> to assess the project 75$ to the benefitting property owners <br /> but in the last 48 hours he has found flaws with that opinion. <br /> Frahm pointed out that the fair market value of the Crystal <br /> Bay residents will not rise $10 ,850 and that the people will <br /> probably challenge that number and have it reduced. Frahm <br /> felt the project should be assessed 100% to the benefitting <br /> property owners and let them challenge it individually. <br /> Councilmember T. Adams noted that he will support the motion <br /> because he believes that everyone should have to pay for <br /> their own sewer. Adams tried to come up with a number that <br /> would share the assessment with the Crystal Bay residents <br /> that would solve the problem of the increase in value of the <br /> homes. Adamsfelt that choosing an arbitrary percentage is <br /> not the way to solve that problem and that a better remedy is <br /> through the appeals process and let the judge decide. <br /> Councilmember Grabek explained that he is not happy with the <br /> possibility of someone losing their home because of this <br /> decision. Grabekfelt that the appeals process will be the <br /> best method. <br />