Laserfiche WebLink
� t✓INUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING IiELD MI�RCH 11 , 1985 . PAGE 10 <br /> SET PUBLIC HEARING <br /> DATE - CDBG* Councilmember Frahm moved , Councilmember T. Adams seconded, <br /> to approve the date set for the public hearing concerning <br /> Community Development Block Grand Funds to be held March 25 , <br /> 1985, at 7 : 00 p.m. Motion, Ayes ( 4 ) , Nays ( 0 ) . <br /> LONG LARE SEWER <br /> PLANT PROPERTY* Councilmember Frahm moved , Councilmember T. Adams seconded , <br /> toaccept the letterwritten by Zoning Administrator Mabusth <br /> to the City of Long Lake concerning the Long Lake Sewer Plant <br /> Property. Motion, Ayes ( 4 ) , Nays ( 0 ) . <br /> 1950 SHORELINE DRIVE <br /> REVIEW OF SEWER UNITS <br /> Nancy Rosenthal of 640 Tonkawa Road was present since she was <br /> interested in the property located at 1950 Shoreline Drive. <br /> Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained that the <br /> property located at 1950 Shoreline Drive has 4 rental units <br /> and that Council should decide how sewer units from the <br /> Crystal Bay Sewer Project will be allocated to the property. <br /> Gaffron noted that the 4 units is a non-conforming use within <br /> that LR-lA zoning district . <br /> City Attorney Radio stated that the City could assess 4 sewer <br /> units to the property and then refund them later if the owner <br /> decides against the 4 units . <br /> Mayor Butler stated that if the City assessed the property <br /> with 4 sewer units that the owner would assume that his 4 units <br /> are a conforming use and that the City likes the idea of the 4 <br /> units on the property. Butler stated that the property at <br /> 1950 will not meet the guidelines for lower income as the <br /> Crystal Bay area has and that the City will not share in any <br /> assessment for this property and the property will be 100� <br /> assessed. <br /> Councilmember Frahm suggested allocating 4 sewer units to <br /> the property if the owner will not agree to sign off on a <br /> document that says he will get rid of 2 of the units . Frahm <br /> stated if the owner will sign off on a document agreeing to get <br /> rid of 2 of the units, then the City will allocate only 2 <br /> units . Frahm stated that under the agreement to allow him <br /> only 2 units , the City should require prompt removal of the 2 <br /> units. <br /> Mayor Butler reinforced the fact that if the owner wants 2 <br /> units, then he must remove the other 2 units promptly. <br /> Butler suggested giving the owner the choice between 4 units <br /> and 2 units . <br />