My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-11-1985 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1985
>
02-11-1985 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/24/2015 2:41:02 PM
Creation date
4/24/2015 2:41:00 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 11, 1985. PAGE 2 <br /> #886 RICflARD RAGATZ <br /> 1945 CONCORDIA STREET <br /> VARIANCE Richard Ragatz was present along with David Kirscht, <br /> designer of proposed deck. Assistant Zoning Administrator <br /> Gaffron explainedthat the Planning Commission approved this <br /> application subject to Council ' s findings in the Krutzig <br /> application . Gaffron stated that the hardcover problem is <br /> then solved if the deck is not considered hardcover, but the <br /> problem is that the deck extends into the 0-75 ' setback area <br /> and decks are considered structures . <br /> Richard Ragatz explained that the house was built in 1921 and <br /> therefore he didn ' t have much of a choice on where to place the <br /> deck. Ragatz noted that placing the deck on the side of the <br /> property is not very acceptable to his neighbors in that the <br /> deck would be located directly outside the r.eighbors bedroom <br /> window. <br /> David Kirscht showed the Council some slides of the property. <br /> Planning Commission Representative Rovegno noted that <br /> Ragatzdid remove some hardcoverwithin that lakeshore area . <br /> Rovegno noted that Planning Commission approved the Ragatz <br /> application contingent upon Council ' s positive findings on <br /> the Krutzig application. Rovegno stated that once the <br /> hardcoverissue was solved, then the Planning Commission had <br /> to deal with the question of whether the deck structure <br /> within the 0-75 ' setback zone is considered a non- <br /> encroachment as well . <br /> Councilmember Frahm stated that he was at the Planning <br /> Commission meeting where this application was reviewed. <br /> Frahm noted that the main problem with decks is they were <br /> always considered hardcover and therefore the City never got <br /> into review of decks because hardcover was not allowed . <br /> Frahm noted that this deck does not block the view of any <br /> neighbors which was his next concern. <br /> Councilmember T. Adams noted that whatever acti_on the <br /> Council ta)�es tonight will set a precedent . Adams stated <br /> the City should consider drafting new setbacks for lakeshore <br /> if certain decks are not considered hardcover. <br /> Councilmember L. Adams asked for the average setback of <br /> surrounding homes in the area. Adams stated that it looked <br /> as if the homes were less than 75 ' from the lake. <br /> Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that an <br /> average setback study was not done but that it appeared there <br /> were homes both less than and more than 75 ' from the lakeshore <br /> in the area . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.