Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OE �r►_i�: REGULAt2 ORONO COUNCIT MEE'PING HELD OCTOBER 29, 198� . PAGf� 16 <br /> #820 Fisk (cont) <br /> �ouncilme,nber GraUek staL�3 thaL if tlZe City is going to <br /> look at tl�e precedent issue that way and look into the <br /> future, then t)�e City has to pay attention to the <br /> precedents tf�at have already been set. Grabek stated <br /> that the Council should look at all the important <br /> factors of the individual lot and not worry about <br /> se l- �i ny a �rece�7enc�. .. <br /> Council:n��ni�er �-Iam:n��rel sta�ed tn:�t in t��e findings for_ <br /> c3enial , t,�� ^ity s��ould not inc)_ude that t�ze i�eighbors <br /> wanted to nurchase the ��ro��er�_y and i�,=�ve made an oCter . <br /> Mayor �utler move:�, Council;ne;nber Adams seconded, to <br /> request sta:Ef to dcai� a .resoluiion of deni��t Lor the <br /> Lorlie Fisk variance aoplication base� on the followiny <br /> ficldinys: <br /> i . The property can be put to a reasonable allowed <br /> use, it can 'ue combined wit'n the adjacent <br /> prouerty, and tnere is an outstarZding offer to <br /> purchase by the adjacent property owner . <br /> 2 . Tne inteni of ihe aoplication is contrary to i�he <br /> �et�er and intent of t��� ��rono Co.�npreh�nsiv� Plan. <br /> 3 . The develo�:�ent ac�:�/or granti�ly oE t��e varianc� <br /> waul:� s;�c an ;�:lvc�r5e �r�ce:�e��t in t�n �_itl�. <br /> 4 . 'r�� auplicant/purc���sE�r slzould 'nave nad <br /> nnowle�g� oi rl�e zoning code requi �c��nen�.� ��rioi >>o <br /> purc�ase. ,'�ny hardsl�i�� see;ns to be self impose<a . <br /> 5 . T�is is cax toriait oroperty. <br /> 5 . One-hal� s�v�er unit was charged indicatin�� <br /> question on ti�e uart of someone tnat tne lot is <br /> subsLac�dard . <br /> 7 . ��o lateral sew�r assessment was levied against <br /> this nr_o��rty thereby again raising the question <br /> of tne substandard status of the oroperty. <br /> 8 . The property falls short of the zoning standard to <br /> an extent too gr�at to enable justification of <br /> granting of ti�e variances requested . <br /> 9. The oroperty does not conform to tne current <br /> development� �atrern of the neighbornood. <br /> Motion, Ay�s (4 ) , Nays (1} , �ouncilme,�'o�r Grabek <br /> votec] nay for reasons noted above. <br />