Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 10, 1984 . PAGE 2 <br /> �820 LONIE FISR Zoning AdministratorMabusth stated that this isa lot <br /> area and lot width variance. Mabusth stated that the <br /> lot contains 10 ,761 . 92 sf and applicant seeks a <br /> variance of 32 , 798 sf or a 75 percent variance. <br /> Robert Hoffman, Fisk' s attorney, reviewed with the <br /> Council the basis on which they have asked for the <br /> variance as follows : <br /> l . The variance meets the standards of the <br /> ordinances. <br /> 2 . The variance meets the application of the <br /> standards that the City has established by <br /> granting other variances within the City. <br /> 3 . The facts that have been presented so far do not <br /> indicate any adverse effects on the general <br /> heaith, safety, and welfare of the village. <br /> 4 . Findings for approval made by staff and Planning <br /> Commission that meets the ordinances , meets past <br /> standards set by the City, and no evidence of <br /> adverse effects on general health, safety, and <br /> welfare. <br /> 5 . A denial would leave them with no reasonable use of <br /> the property at all and that there is some <br /> protection under the City' s ordinances for the <br /> applicant. <br /> Hoffman reviewed with the Council the findings on <br /> which the above was based as follows : <br /> l . These are lots of record and have been since <br /> January 1, 1975, and therefore fit within a <br /> certain category of the City' s ordinances as to <br /> how variances should be treated when applied for <br /> for that type of property. <br /> 2 . The City' s ordinance provides that the City can <br /> grant variances in particular situations where <br /> there are practical difficulties or particular <br /> hardships and where the variances do not affect <br /> the purpose and intent of the zoning nor the <br /> general health, safety, and welfare. <br /> 3 . Planning Commission has found that this <br /> particular application meets the City standards <br /> and has found that approving this variance would <br /> not effect the general health, safety, and welfare <br /> or property value in the neighborhood. <br /> 4 . It would place undue hardship on the owner if the <br /> variance was not granted in that the owner would <br /> have no reasonable use of the property thereafter. <br />