My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-08-2017 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2017
>
05-08-2017 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/23/2017 8:26:41 AM
Creation date
5/23/2017 8:26:38 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,May 8,2017 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> 16. #17-3922 CITY OF ORONO,TEXT AMENDMENT: WETLANDS REGULATIONS— <br /> ORDINANCE NO. 196,Third Series.—continued <br /> Round-Up and dandelion deterrent. Printup stated sometimes they go off topic and get emotional but that <br /> he is having a hard time making the connection. <br /> Dankey indicated she does not agree with Council Member Printup and that if you allow people to go <br /> closer to the buffer,there will be creep because that is the way people are. Dankey stated she is fine with <br /> the setback the way it is. <br /> Printup indicated he is okay with the desktop wetland delineation. <br /> Dankey stated some of the delineation maps seem a little extreme and that she is not sure how accurate <br /> they are. <br /> Crosby stated he would like to see that more defined and that the Council could consider allowing things <br /> that will not interfere with the wetland. <br /> Walsh stated the Council could also leave things as is and simply allow fire pits within the setback. <br /> Barnhart noted a recreational fire is 3 x 3 x 3 and a fire pit can be any size. <br /> Seals stated she is undecided about the data that was submitted and whether the setback should be <br /> changed at this time. Seals stated in her view the City can do better than Option 1 or Option 2 but that in <br /> her view people will creep closer to the wetland if the setbacks are reduced. Seals stated she would like <br /> to keep everything the same until the Council looks at it further. Seals stated in her view a larger setback <br /> will not solve all the problems that Long Lake is having since there are other factors that need to be <br /> addressed. <br /> Seals noted the Planning Commission said they don't have enough information and she also does not feel <br /> she has enough information. Seals suggested the Council invite the Watershed District to one of the <br /> Council's work sessions to talk about why the buffers are the way they are and what the impacts are. <br /> Seals stated she would like to have a larger discussion about what can be done to improve the water <br /> quality of the various lakes. <br /> Crosby stated he would also like somebody from the Watershed District to speak with the Council and <br /> that perhaps the City can be a little flexible by allowing fire pits within the setback. <br /> Dankey commented it unfortunately is too late to make the setbacks and buffers better since the homes <br /> are already there and that a 100-foot buffer is never going to happen. <br /> Walsh stated it appears the City Council is in favor of the desktop wetland delineation and to send this <br /> back to Planning Commission to look at setbacks,possible flexibility for some items within the setback, <br /> and to obtain additional information from the Watershed District before a final decision is made. <br /> Seals moved,Printup seconded,to adopt ORDINANCE NO. 196,Third Series,an Ordinance <br /> Amending the Code of Ordinances Pertaining to Wetland Regulations,Option 1. VOTE: Ayes 5, <br /> Nays 0. <br /> Page 32 of 34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.