Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,May 8,2017 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> 16. #17-3922 CITY OF ORONO,TEXT AMENDMENT: WETLANDS REGULATIONS— <br /> ORDINANCE NO. 196,Third Series.—conNnued <br /> Barnhart stated the Watershed District may not require a wetland delineation in certain situations under <br /> their rules and then a wetland buffer would also not be required by the Watershed District. <br /> Barnhart stated in drafting the proposed text amendment,he looked at what other cities are doing. <br /> Minnetonka Beach has a 25-foot setback from the edge of a wetland,Minnetonka requires a 35-foot <br /> setback from the wetland overlay district and 10 feet from the buffer,Minnetrista measures 35 feet from <br /> the wetland edge, and Plymouth uses a straight 15-foot setback from the buffer. Overall Orono is <br /> basically in line with what the other cities are following. <br /> The Planning Commission was provided with three options to review at their April meeting. Those are as <br /> follows: <br /> 1. Recognizing that the Watershed District's focus is regional and the City's is smaller,retain the <br /> existing setback requirements and make no changes to buffers. <br /> 2. Recognizing the City's role in water quality protection,yet balance the need for use of land, <br /> reduce the setback to 22 feet where no buffer is required or has been established. The 22 feet is <br /> nine and one half feet more than the shortest possible buffer required by the Watershed District <br /> for residential properties. In addition,22 feet is a memorable setback, less likely to be lost in the <br /> mind of the applicant,to the benefit of protecting the wetland. <br /> 3. Completely defer buffer requirements to the Watershed District and remove the requirement of a <br /> setback from undeclared buffers and the additional ten feet from declared buffers. <br /> Following a lengthy discussion,the Planning Commission ultimately recommended no changes to the <br /> buffer setback based on the information before them. <br /> The Planning Commission did recommend,however, some changes to the wetland delineation language. <br /> The City currently requires a formal delineation on any property where a project is within 150 feet of a <br /> wetland regardless of the type of wetland. The Watershed District only requires a wetland delineation <br /> when specific wetland rules are triggered,which is usually when a new home is built or the property is <br /> subdivided. <br /> Walsh noted wetland delineations can only be done when the vegetation is actively growing,which is <br /> May through mid-October,and that this change would provide Staff with some flexibility. <br /> Barnhart noted the Watershed District also requires a 15-day comment period following completion of the <br /> delineation to allow residents to comment on it. The proposed ordinance would allow Orono to accept <br /> information for a desk review in lieu of a formal delineation for projects not likely to impact the wetland <br /> due to project scope,distance, and/or topography, similar to methods employed by the Watershed District. <br /> If the applicant disagrees with the City's interpretation of the wetland boundary, a full delineation may be <br /> provided. <br /> Walsh stated if the information is more conservative and the resident does not agree with it,he would <br /> have the ability to obtain a formal wetland delineation. <br /> Page 21 of 34 <br />