Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,May 8,2017 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> 15. #17-3941 LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT,LLC,OB/O RICK AND BARBARA <br /> LUPIENT,3580 IVY PLACE, SKETCH PLAN REVIEW—Continued <br /> the property owner who has the view easement to see whether there is any chance of changing that <br /> easement. There is a neighbor that also has a deck and a driveway that encroaches into the setback. <br /> The property is a peninsula that is wooded with mostly poor-quality volunteer trees. The land is relatively <br /> flat,with some portions of the site actually being located within the floodplain. Some mitigation <br /> measures may be required as a result. <br /> Each of the two proposed lots exceeds the minimum acreage requirements. Each lot is supposed to face <br /> on a public street or an appropriate private easement. The applicants are proposing to create a 30-foot <br /> wide outlot to meet City standards. Lot 2,being platted as a back lot given the unusual property shape <br /> and access limitations,more than meets the 150 percent lot area requirement. Each lot exceeds the 100- <br /> foot width requirement. The front/back lot configuration was recommended by Staff as the most <br /> conforming method of converting these three lots into two. In order to convert the three lots into two lots, <br /> a new,relocated access corridor to get past proposed Lot 1 is necessary. <br /> Since the property is located on a peninsula, with both lots having shoreline on two sides,the average <br /> lakeshore setback appears to be defined by the location of the adjacent home at 3560 Ivy. Since any new <br /> homes on Lots 1 and 2 must be at least 75 feet from the shore, Staff would suggest that 75 feet become <br /> the required average setback regardless of which of Lots 1 or 2 is built on first. As a result,the line <br /> between proposed Lots 1 and 2 becomes the front lot line,requiring a 45-foot setback when the back lot <br /> 150 percent of standard setbacks rule is applied. <br /> The proposed driveway extends from the end of traveled Ivy Place through the road easement across 3560 <br /> Ivy and is proposed to be constructed as an 8-foot wide paved driveway within Outlot A. The actual <br /> driving surface is proposed to be mostly 30 feet from the shore, while portions will be within 12 to 25 feet <br /> from the shoreline. Maximum driveway width allowed within 75 feet of the lake is eight feet. The <br /> proposed driveway will require a hardcover variance. While eight feet is minimal for a driveway serving <br /> two residences,that is the maximum width allowed by code within 75 feet of the lake. With the driveway <br /> being so close to the lake, it would be appropriate that stormwater management facilities be established to <br /> mitigate impacts of runoff from the driveway. <br /> It is likely that re-grading of substantial portions of the site will be proposed and a number of trees will <br /> likely be removed. The need for grading within the 0-75 foot protected zone should be carefully reviewed <br /> at the time a preliminary plat application is proposed. <br /> Staff does not believe there is any reasonable way to construct a cul-de-sac since it would eliminate the <br /> ability to construct more than one house. That cul-de-sac would also be within 75 feet of the lake. The <br /> Fire Chief has suggested the residences be provided with fire suppression sprinkler systems given the <br /> narrowness of Ivy Street and the narrow width of the driveway. Gaffron stated it might be reasonable to <br /> widen the width of the driveway to 10 feet,which would require a variance. The applicants are proposing <br /> a fairly short backup apron on both lots,which Staff does not feel is a big issue. Construction traffic <br /> would need to be located on site. <br /> The property is served by municipal water and sewer and some fees will be required. There is also a <br /> sewer connection for the house at 3560 coming across into this property, which will need to be located <br /> and determined if an easement is required. <br /> Page 18 of 34 <br />