Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,May 8,2017 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> 14. #17-3910 LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT,LLC,3245 WAYZTA BOULEVARD WEST, <br /> INTERIM USE PERMIT: TEMPORARY USE FOR CONSTRUCTION STAGING.—Continued <br /> Walsh stated it sounds like Mr. Fretham has to go through a lot more permitting than the contractor. <br /> No additional public comments were received. <br /> Crosby stated in his view this property is a better spot than the Mn/DOT property since the City can set <br /> parameters on the use and it is further away. Crosby stated he is not as concerned with the quality of the <br /> soil until they are ready to build the residential development. <br /> Printup stated he disagrees with the location and that in his view there is no suitable site in Orono. <br /> Seals indicated she agrees with Council Member Printup. <br /> Walsh stated he has concerns with the apple orchard and the dust. Walsh stated they also have the <br /> Mn/DOT site and the question is whether the City can mitigate that site in some way. Walsh stated he is <br /> not in favor of rock crushing in Orono but noted that activity is currently occurring in downtown Long <br /> Lake in front of Otten Brothers. Walsh asked if they would be able to get the storage moved to this site <br /> but not the rock crushing part. <br /> Mattick stated the City can allow it on this site but that the City has limited control over the Mn/DOT site. <br /> Walsh stated he would prefer no crushing on this site but that the City cannot tell the contractor not to use <br /> the Mn/DOT site, which is closer to the apple orchard. Walsh stated he also is not in favor of other debris <br /> from other cities' projects being brought to this site. <br /> Dankey noted there is a residential development being constructed right next to the apple orchard as well <br /> and that the use will be for a limited amount of time. Dankey stated the permit can also be terminated at <br /> any time if the City deems it appropriate. <br /> Seals asked Mr. Engleman if he has a preference for which site it would be at. <br /> Engleman stated it would be better on the Eisinger property since it would be further away but noted the <br /> Council is concerned about the contamination to the site. Engleman noted the rock crushing will also <br /> contaminate the state land. Engleman stated in his view the City should get some money for the rock <br /> crushing and that the City should not have to support them. <br /> Printup asked where the runoff goes off of the Eisinger site. <br /> Gaffron stated whatever runs off the existing Eisinger site goes to the wetlands and that the developer <br /> could possibly construct some settling basins to help slow the runoff and help it infiltrate. Gaffron stated <br /> if the Council is interested in those conditions,they can be imposed,but Staff would need to look into it. <br /> Fretham stated the black dotted silt fence that goes around the entire perimeter of the site is to control <br /> runof£ Fretham noted they have obtained the Watershed perxnit so they have reviewed the storm water <br /> management for the site. <br /> Page 15 of 34 <br />