Laserfiche WebLink
M�NU7'ES OI� TIiE REGULIIR ORONO COUNCII� MEL;TING IiELD DECEMI3EIt 10 , 1984 PI�GE; 3 <br /> Wayne Quast of 1205 Brown Road South stated that there <br /> are no trees left . <br /> Other neighbors that live along that block were all in <br /> agreement to have the sewer line run along the front of <br /> their properties . <br /> City Engineer Cook stated with the owner ' s consent that <br /> this might reduce the project cost by as much as <br /> $20 , 000 . <br /> Mayor Butler explained that the Council had previously <br /> directed the Enqineer to go back and try to reduce the <br /> sewer project cost as much as possible. Butler noted <br /> that if the Council was to choose the 50-50 assessment <br /> option, that the per unit cost would be $5 , 270 . 00 . <br /> City Engineer Cook stated that he looked at a method of <br /> assessing the project 40 percent on the front foot and <br /> 60 percent on the unit charge. Cook stated that based <br /> on assessing 50 percent of the project to the <br /> benefitting properties , thefrontfootage charge would <br /> be $i9 . 80/lineal foot and the unit charge would be <br /> $3 ,170/unit. Cook used an example of a small lot ( 50 ' <br /> lot) which the assessment would be $4 , 160 or about <br /> $1 , 000 less than the assessment on the total unit. <br /> Cook stated that on a large lot ( 200 ' lot ) the <br /> assessment would be $7 , 030 . <br /> Curtis Quady of 1223 Brown Road asked the Council why <br /> they were still discussing the 50-50 option, when the <br /> neighbors have already told the Council that they will <br /> not accept the 50-50 option. Quady stated thaL the <br /> neighborhood wants the 30-70 split. <br /> Gary Printup of 1261 Briar Street asked why the Art <br /> Center hasn ' t been inclUded in the project yet. <br /> Printup also noted that there isn' t much difference <br /> between the 50-50 option and 30-70 option. Printup <br /> asked why the Council doesn ' t choose the 30-70 option. <br /> Printup noted the f igures from the last meeting in which <br /> with the 50-50 opti.on on a $75 , 000 home and a $25 , 000 <br /> income, the general tax payer would have to pay $29 . 50 <br /> per year. Printup stated that with the 30-70 option it <br /> would increase only to $35 . 40 per year for 15 years . <br /> Mayor Butler stated that there will be other sewer <br /> projects in the future, and the Council would set a <br /> precedent for other sewer projects by using this 50-50 <br /> assessment option. Butler stated that other areas of <br /> the City have not had this benefit where the general tax <br /> payers have picked up part of the bill . <br /> One lady stated that only about 7 percent of the homes <br /> are having septic problems. She felt that sewer was <br /> being pushed on them. <br />