Laserfiche WebLink
� � NIINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING • <br /> Monday,March 9,2004 <br /> . 7:00 0'clock p.m. <br /> (PUBLXC CO ENTS, Continued} <br /> Murphy suggested th ouncil review the records in tl�cis particu3ar instance and also r ew tk�e City's <br /> account receivables for t period of time. Murphy stated he does recall discuss' this situation in a <br /> work session,with the outco e being that the Councii was agreeable to redu ' g it to the original fee of <br /> $120Q. <br /> McMilian requested Mrs. Feyo put do in writing her vers'so the facts and the reasons slle is <br /> requesting the waiver. McMillan indica she would like see the invoices. <br /> Mzs, Feyo stated she has never seen an invoice. <br /> McMillan requested Staff provide a cop the invoice Mzs.Feyo so slte can xeview them. McMi4lan <br /> asked Mrs.Feyo to put down in wrif her thoughts and r ale regarding the situation and the request <br /> for the wa�ver. <br /> Mrs.Feyo stated she ha ked how many other applications were char extra fees at that time but that <br /> they did not receive y information frorn the City. <br /> White com ted he does rememher a coup3e of larger projects in that time perio at were charged <br /> extra fee . <br /> hy pointed out that engineering fees on top of the application fees are applied when the <br /> trcumstances warrant the additionai cost. � <br /> John Eiss,3445 Crystal Bay Road,stated he is hexe before the Council tonight to request a dock for his <br /> property. Eiss stated he is paying taxes based on a lakeshore lot but is not allowed a dock. Eiss noted his <br /> other naighbors with lots similar to his have docks and that he is the only one that does not have a dock. <br /> White notad Lot 38 is located in front of tl�is lot and that tlus lot is not immediately adjacent to the lake. <br /> Eiss stated those four smaller lots are city-owned. <br /> White stated the City clarified a couple of years ago that residents who do not have a principal residence <br /> adjoining the lakeshore wouid not be entitled to a dock but would be ahle to swim or launch a canoe from <br /> the city-owned property, White noted that policy has been upheld by the City for a number of decades. <br /> White stated in his opinion the issue of paying taxes based on a lakeshore lot is a sepa.rate issue from the <br /> dock issue. <br /> Eiss noted his 1ot is classified as a residential lakeshore and that the title to his property says he has <br /> lakeshore rights. <br /> White commented that assessors do not always classify properties cortectly. White asked if Mr.Eiss has <br /> contacted the City previously regarding his request. <br /> Eiss indicated he has not. Eiss stated he doas not want to jeopardize his neighbors' docks to the east with <br /> hi.s request, <br /> White asked whethar there are other dooks located on the city-owned lots. <br /> PAG�3 of S <br />