My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-08-1982 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1982
>
03-08-1982 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2015 1:43:58 PM
Creation date
4/23/2015 1:43:56 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
REGULAR MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, MARCH 8 , 1982 PAGE -7- <br /> City Administrator Benson, andI went to the <br /> Watershed and stated that the City did not <br /> want the Watershed to drop the lake down, that <br /> the City wanted them to leave it at 929. 3 through <br /> July, and through the first two weeks of August and <br /> then drop it 1/10 at the end of August and then <br /> bring it down according to the two year plan. <br /> The Watershed took this plan to the DNR and the <br /> DNR decided to leave it at this height in July, <br /> but drop it 2/10 in August and then on down. <br /> This plan was approved back in August to operate <br /> through this winter and that plan is not operational <br /> and we are now back to the original plan. <br /> The new plan is to lower the elevation in which a <br /> no discharge situation will happen . During the <br /> months of March, April , May, June . July, August, <br /> September and the first of October, it will dis- <br /> charge water at certain rates all the way down ,to <br /> 928 . 7 then from the middle of October through the <br /> first of March it will discharge water another 1 . 2 <br /> inches or down to 928 . 6 . <br /> When we talk about flow under the old dam plan, <br /> 928 . 6 was the low point. It would discharge 0 <br /> and as the water went up to 929. 0 it would dis- <br /> charqe up to 10 cu. ft. per second. When it qot <br /> to 929 . 0 and 929 . 2 it would now discharge from <br /> 10-30 cu. ft. per second and when it went up 2/10 <br /> more it would go from 30 to 100 cu. ft. per second, <br /> and when it went up from 929 . 4 to 929 . 6 it would <br /> go from 100 to 250 and 300 to 380 , 460 to 520 , <br /> 520 to 575 cu. ft . per second. The idea was to <br /> modify the original plan to allow some discharge <br /> to approximate the fact that there would be some <br /> small discharge all the way down to 928 .6 . So <br /> what the Watershed is saying from the middle of <br /> May to the middle of July they are going to allow <br /> 15 cu. ft. per second to discharge, and from the <br /> middle of July to the middle of August they are <br /> going to allow 10 cu ft. to discharge down to the <br /> 928 . 8 and then from the middle of March to the <br /> middle of September they are going to allow it to <br /> discharge 7 cu. ft. per second until the lake <br /> reaches 928 . 7 and then there will be no discharge . <br /> Under the original plan, Jan . Feb. & Mar. they would <br /> discharge 25 cu. ft. per second. Under the new plan <br /> 150 cu. ft. per second. <br /> In the language of the proposed change it states that <br /> when the water level rises to 929 . 6 it will discharge <br /> at 250 cu. ft . per second. Language now changes to <br /> state it will discharge at a maximum of 250 cu. ft. <br /> per second , provided that the creek will take it. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.