Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, DECEMBER 30 , 1982 PAGE -2- <br /> LAKE ORDINANCE CON'T. separated by a road riqht of way identified by the <br /> , City of Orono as one building site , when in fact <br /> when purchased by Mr . Ahern were two different <br /> sites. For reasons I don ' t understand , under <br /> your new ordinance, these were combined as one <br /> building site even though they were divided by a <br /> plated city street . It appeared the ordinance <br /> intended to take all individual lots and cause <br /> them to be buildable with exception of the ones you <br /> talk about. In response to that it would appear <br /> the ordinance would cause that a numb�r of lots <br /> would become only one lot . Roy sold the lots <br /> before this ordinance went into effect. The new <br /> copy of the ordinance shows you have made changes , <br /> that changes the time of the ocaners of record for <br /> tr,ese lots , and it is that portion of the <br /> ordinance (the owners of record) that I would like <br /> to take this opportunity to object to . Can I ask <br /> why it was done? <br /> Mayor Van Nest then asked Mr . Olson for the facts <br /> on these lots. Mr . Olson stated the facts of the <br /> matter : are that he has two separate <br /> holdings.The way the ordinance is written. One is <br /> number #58 and that lot is approximately . 32 <br /> acres , completely separate from the other <br /> holdings Mr . Ahern had . This was declared <br /> buildable because it has a house on it. Second <br /> part is properties that we have combined �s #15 <br /> slightly north of thefirst property (separated by <br /> John Dean ' s property) . Parcel #15 combined on <br /> both sides of the right of way totals ?_ 1/2 acres . <br /> Neither piece is 2 acr�s by itself , and so under <br /> the current code,the 1974 code, it would be one <br /> site , or would not be rebuildable . The cabin that <br /> isonthatpropertyiscompletelydeteriorated and <br /> is in hazardous condition at this point . There <br /> was a permit issued at one time to rebuild it but <br /> was never acted on, it is not being used and is not <br /> habitable at this time. Mr . Olson stated that he <br /> has talked to Mr . Ahern and Mr . Creer on this <br /> matter in his office. <br /> Mr . Roy Ahern stated that he had taken out the <br /> building permitand hadbeen doing some remodeling <br /> in the cabin up until the time he sold the <br /> property. <br /> Mayor Van Nest asked Mr . Ahern what had he sold , <br /> and Mr . Ahern stated that he sold because of the <br /> � ordinance bei.ng passed , and he was not going to be <br /> able to use any of that property, he sold all of it . <br /> He stated he sold all of the parcels except for #58 <br /> because I was not qoing to be able to use any of the <br /> property the way I wanted to under the ordinance . <br />