Laserfiche WebLink
Metadata
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
.'y • <br /> REGULAR MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNC.IL, OCTOBER 14 , 1981 Page 2 <br /> Alan Olson, City Planner, reviewed with t.he City DAKOTA AVENUE/SUMAC <br /> Council his memo regarding addresses of Dakota LANE <br /> Avenue and Sumac Lane, dated October 9 , 1981. <br /> Mayor Van Nest stated that the problem concerning <br /> which street name to use should be left to the <br /> neighbors to decide and agree between themselves <br /> whether Dakota Avenue or Sumac Lane . The Mayor <br /> informed the residents of the area that were present, <br /> that it is absolutely necessary to have only one <br /> name for all homes and to have addresses in proper <br /> order. The City Council will not let the current <br /> confusion exist because of public safety problems. <br /> It was agreed that a reasonable amount of time would <br /> be necessary for the residents to get together and <br /> find a reasonable solution to the problem. <br /> Mayor Van Nest moved, Hurr seconded, to table the <br /> item concerning addresses for. Dakota Avenue/Sumac <br /> Lane for one month and requested staff to write a <br /> letter to all concerned so as an agreement can be <br /> reached on a solution to the problem. Motion, <br /> Ayes (4) - Nays (0) . <br /> Richard Hassel , attorney representing David Duff, DAVID DUFF S�WER <br /> concerning Mr. Duff ' s request for sewer at 1420 Shore�ine Drive <br /> 1420 Shoreline Drive. <br /> Mr. Hassel stated that he would like to know the <br /> history of the 1980-1 sewer project and the reasons <br /> why Mr. Duff ' s property was left out to the project. <br /> Mr. Hassel informed the Council that Mr . Duff is <br /> now requesting to have sewer installed due to a <br /> failure of his septic system, and also to allow him <br /> to build a second house on his land. He would like <br /> to know the procedures to follow. <br /> Mr. Hassel was informed by Mayor Van Nest that Mr. Duff <br /> had apparently chosen not to be included in the 1980-LS-1 <br /> sewer project. Mayor Van Nest explained the procedures <br /> that were followed before construction of the sewer project <br /> and stated that Mr . Duff had every opportunity to be <br /> included in the project. Public Information meetings, <br /> public hearings, and many letters were available for all <br /> residents in the proposed sewer areas so that every one <br /> would have input and all the particulars before the <br /> sewer project was ordered in. Mr. Duff also had Resolution <br /> #1180 mailed to him informing him of the st3tus of his <br /> property. Mayor Van Nest stated that Mr. Duff did not <br /> respond to the resolution that deleted the Duff praperty <br /> from the project. Mayor Van Nest also said that in his <br /> conversations with Mr. Duff during the sewer project <br /> discussion, that Mr. Duff, at that time, never had <br /> expressed any plans to build a second house . The decision <br /> to stay out of the project was Mr. Duff ' s. <br /> (Continued) <br />