Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. 675 <br />story deck located on the lake side of the house; a deck is not part of the new home <br />application, although a grade -level patio similar to the existing patio is proposed. <br />A9. A variance application was submitted in 2016 for addition of a second story above the <br />existing garage. Prior to Planning Commission review, that application was put on hold <br />(later withdrawn) when the Applicants and their builder concluded that drainage issues for <br />the existing house could not be resolved through remodeling. The current application, for <br />replacement of the existing house and garage in the same location as the existing, resolves <br />the drainage issues, and accomplishes the desired added living space, within virtually the <br />same footprint as the existing home. <br />A10. The new home with a full story above the garage will increase the livability of the property <br />while not increasing hardcover, and structural coverage is well below the limit for this site. <br />The close proximity to the lakeshore as well as the substandard setback to the street are <br />clearly a function of the lack of lot depth from the street to the lake, and this factor is shared <br />by the two adjacent homes to the immediate south. <br />Al 1. Applicants intend to save the existing trees on the lake side of the property, which provides <br />buffering of the fagade as viewed from the lake. The house across the street sits <br />significantly higher than Applicants' house, so that lake views enjoyed by that off -lake <br />owner (views which are not protected by code) will be minimally affected. <br />Al2. In considering this application for variances, the Council has considered the advice and <br />recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed variances <br />upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic <br />conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values <br />of property in the surrounding area. <br />VARIANCE ANALYSIS: <br />Bl. "Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes <br />and intent of the ordinance . . . . " Single family residences are a permitted use within the <br />LR -IC zoning district. <br />B2. "Variances shall only be permitted... when the variances are consistent with the <br />comprehensive plan." The proposed residential principal structure is a residential use <br />which is consistent with the comprehensive plan guiding of this and surrounding <br />properties for residential use. <br />B3. "Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are <br />practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. `Practical difficulties,' as used <br />in connection with the granting of a variance, means that: <br />The property owner in question proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner, <br />however, the proposed use is not permitted by the official controls." <br />Page 3 of 6 <br />