Laserfiche WebLink
. , Page 20 <br /> Mr. Andrew J. Gotten <br /> April 23, 1981 <br /> - Page 2 . <br /> total project cost is lower than anticipated costs, the City <br /> Council will consider reducing the remaining resident assessments. <br /> Keep in mind, each area is a separate project and stands on its <br /> own merits. <br /> Concerning your concern regarding the City Council ' s apparent <br /> reluctance to split your nearly four acres, it is obvious the <br /> City Council was not willing to create densities below average <br /> lot size when this below average lot size prevelant in your area <br /> was what was causing on-site problems in a rural area. <br /> The City Council did assess you one unit only, at your request, <br /> simply because any future subdivision requested by you was to <br /> create a lot that would be served by an on-site system, not municipal <br /> sewer, which was your desire when this question was asked of you <br /> at our public meetings. I enclose Resolution #1178 for your <br /> information. <br /> I have requested Bruce Malkerson, our lead City Attorney, to <br /> address your other concerns regarding legal counsel matters . His <br /> letter to you should be received by you this week. My experience <br /> in these matters is that the City is always accused of attempting <br /> to avoid its responsibilities when a project as you are experiencing <br /> is constructed. We try to communicate and eliminate any possible <br /> miscommunications. Andrew, we tried to communicate with you, <br /> letters were sent, phone calls were made, we attempted to contact <br /> you every way possible but until now, we never received from you <br /> any acknowledgement of our attempts to clarify these issues with <br /> you. <br /> Thank you for your Certificate of Title #50555 . <br /> Call me when you are available and we can discuss these matters <br /> further . <br /> Sincerely, <br /> l� <br /> Walte R. enson <br /> City Administrator <br /> Enclosure <br />