Laserfiche WebLink
• Page 14 <br /> /J�l��z�� 2�'7�� / 7����1� I , K / �.L�L��f�1�f�c�y� / Kri• Glrnn R. Cooti, P.C. <br /> ;Eiyi s,i A'n1h A. Coidon, P.E. <br /> Gtro G. Uonrsrroo, P.E. Thoma.r E. A'nvrt� P.[. <br /> e � p RoLo1 H'. Hosrne,P.£. Rirhard 1i'.Fo��rr, P.£. <br /> Ju�rFh C. Andrrlik, P.E. Robnr C.Schunirh�. Y.E. <br /> 2335 4f/. `I�.....c sV:�...�y 36 D.ud/nrd A. Lcmbng. P.E. llfan rn L.So.rala, P.E. <br /> ^ Robnf D.Frigan�d,P.E. Donald C. Aurga.dr,P.E. <br /> �'1. /��,(, /�,,,,�§§�J3 • Richa�d E. Turnn, P.E. )crry A. Bnwdon � <br /> /��... 612-636-k600 lamta C. 04nn, T.£. hfmk A Honson <br /> s��,��n nr. o����r�. <br /> ' An•�n K. W'o1ka,P.E. <br /> Cliarlas A.E.ickt�n <br /> Leo hf. Pnwrlsky <br /> Narlan Af. Olson <br /> S e p t emb er 2 6, 19 80 Darid E. 01son <br /> Cit}' of Orono <br /> Bo x. 6 6 ' <br /> Crvstal Bay, Mn . 55323 <br /> Attn: Mr. Richard Benson <br /> Re: File No. 13903 <br /> Minnetonka Bluffs , etc. <br /> De ar Ri ch ard, <br /> The letter received from MWCC on September 2 , 1980 indicates that the City of <br /> Orono will not be allowed to connect to the *iWCC force main interceptor at the <br /> locations originallv requested . The bids received on September 12, 1980 allow <br /> us to more accurately determine the additional cost to connect to the force <br /> main interceptor at locations recotumended bv the "iWCC. <br /> ' . <br /> Tne proposed location of the three connections points to the MWCC force main <br /> and the MWCC reco�nended location is listed below: <br /> l. Co. Rd . 51 - Present connection point 750' east of Co. Rd . 84 - MWCC <br /> desired connection point - Gravity line @ Co. Rd. 84. <br /> 2. Co. Rd . 15 - Present connection point 2000' south of Orono Orchard <br /> Lane Station or 17+00 - M[dCC recommends same location. <br /> 3. Co. rd . 15 - Present connection point 775 ' east of Orono Orchard R�ad <br /> @ Sta. 95+50 - MWCC desired connection point 175' north of Co. Rd . 15 ' <br /> on Orono Orchard Road. <br /> Tne connection points as recommended by MWCC would increase the project cost <br /> as follows based on the low bid received on September 12, 1980. <br /> Iacation Increased Proiect Cost <br /> 1. County Road 51 �16,700.00 <br /> 2. County Road 15 Sta. or 17+00 No Change <br /> ' 3. County Raad 15 Sta. 95+50 �40,450.00 <br /> TY�e MidCC does have concern for metering of flows and may have some technical <br /> basis for tneir recommendation for connection point I on Co. Rd. 51 . T11e con- <br /> nection at the point recommended by MWCC would increase the per unit cost <br /> about �1 ,400.00 and we do not feel the additional cost is warranted. <br /> Page 1 . <br /> 708a <br />