07-14-1980 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

REGULAR MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, JULY 14 , 1980 Page 13 7 . Andrew Goetten - 1385 Fox Street 80-i & 80-2 SEWERS (Continued) 3 .60 acres. Owner has indicated he would opt for one unit to serve existing house, with any future division to be under two-acre unsewered zoning regulations. I recommend this be allowed. 8 . Douglas Skarp - West Ferndale Road Three acre lot with 0 . 6 acre± dry. No house on lot. Owner has requested a sewer unit for the property. If sewer unit were allowed, buildable lot area would be governed under Orono Zoning Code 31.841 (wetlands credit) . I recommend this be referred to the Planning Commissiori for review. 9 . Marinas - windward Marine & Minnetonka Boat Works Preliminary staff recommendation was one unit for marina buildings and one unit for pumpout, i.e . two units for Windward Marine, two units for Minnetonka Boat Works, and one unit each for the three residences adjacent, for a total of seven units . However, SAC charges for commercial properties are based on 274 gallons per day per SAC unit. I recommend staff investigate further to determine whether the proposed assessment distribution is equitable. 10 . David Duff - 1420 Shoreline Drive 2 .90 acre lot. Owner has not indicated preference for inclusion or exclusion from the project. I recommend that the Duff property be excluded from the project. 11. William or Stanley Gregory - 1410 Shoreline Drive Nine acres ±. This property will not be included in the project. 12 . Nature Conservancy holds title deed to this tri- angular parcel southeast of intersectidn of County Roa� 15 and West Ferndale Road. This parcel has one- acre of dry buildable land, but has title restrictions which prohibit development of the property. I recommend that the City Attorney review these restrictions and that no units be assessed. 13 . Marie H. Hamm - Orono Lane 1. 1 acre lot appears nearly all dry buildable. While not located in a choice location, this lot would probably be buildable if sewer were availabie . The owner has not indicated a preference to be included or excluded from the project. I recommend that this be referred to the Planning Commission for review. (Continued)