My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-21-1980 Council Minutes Public Hearing proposed sewer
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
1980-1989
>
1980
>
05-21-1980 Council Minutes Public Hearing proposed sewer
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/22/2015 1:54:09 PM
Creation date
4/22/2015 1:54:08 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Page 3 <br /> PLFERT ANG � E'�' S, `; R. <br /> �CC�. � �. _�T �F['L __.�� 1�� <br /> SC� fJiCO��E' N��L <br /> p•.7NNL:.-_•L'S�M:'vnESC-h �_ 'v2 <br /> ' '4 <br /> :�.ay 19 , �9�0 <br /> T�iavor William B. Var����est <br /> and City Council 2�lembers <br /> Ci�y of Orono � <br /> P. O. Box 66 <br /> Crystal Bay , r2innesota 55323 <br /> Dear Nayor VanNest anc Council N�erlbers : � <br /> ' Unfortunately, Z have to be out of towr. May 21st , the <br /> d�te o� the public hearing ror the proposed sew2r pro- <br /> ject on North Sho?-e Drive. I believe my views are well <br /> known to most of you--I would like the project completed <br /> as soon as possible. <br /> Throughout this process we , the residents, have been told <br /> that our views would be taken intc account and tha� it <br /> was up to us to decide whether or not we wanted the pro- <br /> �ect. I believe the vote (8 to 3 with one abstentior., <br /> or 8 to 4 in favor) is a rinqing endorsement that should ,_ <br /> not nor cannot be ignored by you, our elected repre- <br /> sentatives. I believe the project is essential for the <br /> reasons specified in my previous letters to you so I <br /> will not belabor those points here. I would only like <br /> to emphasize that the project has been overwhelmingly <br /> approved by tnose of us affected and that the bidding <br /> climate is e�;tremely favorable at the present time--one <br /> onlv has to look at the low bids coming in on the <br /> stadium to see the savings we might realize if we mo��e <br /> witnout delay. I might add that witn the extremeiy drj� <br /> weather we have been h�ving, tne water levels have dropped <br /> and construction miqht be cor.siderably less costly. It <br /> is no�T time to act--tc folloti� tnrouah with your original <br /> �romise thzt the resinGnts should decide the issue--we <br /> have decided--we want the �-oject by at least 2 to l . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.