Laserfiche WebLink
. R <br /> 2845 Little Orchard <br /> July 17, 2001 <br /> Page 4 <br /> of the lake except where absolutely necessary to stabilize slopes; and where planting areas need to <br /> be mulched,wood chips rather than rock will provide a more natural look. The City's goal is to have <br /> the site restored to a natural looking shoreline landscape, not for it to become a manicured garden <br /> or lawn. <br /> Additional Topics for Discussion <br /> In November 1998 Council approved a slight revision to the easement which relocated the boundary <br /> of the"Protected Area"and granted the ability to have manicured lawn within the northeaster1y10' <br /> of the Protected Area. The proposed restoration plan indicates a relatively small portion of lawn, <br /> perhaps 40-50' in length, will be within the northeasterly 15' of the Protected Area, i.e. an <br /> encroachment of perhaps 5' x 50' or 250 s.f. This lawn area is relatively flat and will be well <br /> screened from lake view by the proposed shrubs bordering the lawn, and is still about 70' from the <br /> shoreline. To balance this, additional area along the westerly lot line is being kept in natural <br /> groundcovers and not manicured. Staff has no problem with this trade-off. <br /> The uniform 3:1 slope just west of the house near the pool is perhaps 20'x 70' in length. While the <br /> plan shows the potential for two interim retaining walls in this area, the owner believes this slope <br /> can be maintained in natural ground cover (primarily bush honeysuckle) without the need for the <br /> walls.Those walls would be within the bluff setback and would be no more than 1'-2'in height each, <br /> if they aze constructed. In the event the owner decides to add these walls,staff has no problem with <br /> them provided that they are screened with plantings. <br /> The existing well house located underground about 30' from the shoreline has been discussed at <br /> length. It was not required to be removed when the property was subdivided;however, its removal <br /> would require extensive regrading and the owner has concluded that he will leave it in place. <br /> The proposed stairway to the lake is allowed under the terms of the easement and by Orono code. <br /> The design at a slight angle will allow it to be screened from lake view, and it is following the <br /> existing contours. Staff has no problem with this stairway as shown on the plan. A prior proposal <br /> for a second stairway was dropped based on staff advising the applicant that only one stairway could <br /> be allowed under the ordinances. <br />