My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-14-1980 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1980
>
04-14-1980 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/22/2015 1:39:38 PM
Creation date
4/22/2015 1:39:31 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• Page 38 <br /> ' s�. <br /> Metropolitan ��7aste Control Commission <br /> April 10 , 1980 <br /> Page Five <br /> The City of Orono, through its council and staff , has studied <br /> this problem for over eight years , and the city has decided <br /> that as part of its comprehensive land use plan to prohibit <br /> this sort of urbanization in part because of this adverse <br /> environmental effect on the watershed and Lake r7innetonka . <br /> � This rural land use approach is consistent with the compre- <br /> hensive plans of the cities of Medina, Independence , Minnetrista <br /> and Orono. To drive an interceptor across this open area is <br /> totally inconsistent with the comprehensive land use plans of <br /> the cities, �ahich land use plans are adopted by those cities <br /> pursuant to Minnesota Statutes , �462. 01 , et seq . The PCA <br /> and the MWCC have learned that the infiltration and inflow <br /> problems in the Maple Plain Sewer System are bad and that the <br /> infiltration and inflow problem will have to be corrected in <br /> the future by the city, 'I'hat correction does not necessitate <br /> the installation of an intercepto�, The City of Maple Plain <br /> can apply for infiltration monies to help solve that problem <br /> not�. The I & I analysis can be completed to determine what <br /> the flo�v figures will be once the infiltration problem is <br /> solved. Once that problem is solved , then there is no need <br /> to expand the plant or to construct an interceptor. As indi- <br /> cated previously, the 201 plan report shows that by spending <br /> just $30 ,000 , the phosphorous discharge can be removed so that <br /> the plant will be in compliance with tl�e required standards , <br /> at a far less cost in money and effect on the environment. <br /> There is a need tc have this infornation available before tax- <br /> payers' dollars are wasted. <br /> Moreover, it may be that the phosphorous removed can be used <br /> in a way to benefit society. The cost of phosphorous for <br /> farmers as fertilizer will double this year and that phosphorous ' <br /> is a valuable product especially when it is located in the mid- <br /> dle of an agricultural area such as the City of Maple Plain. <br /> A plan which proposes to pump this phosphorous 30 miles away <br /> to be discharged into the Minnesota River at great expense to <br /> society just does not make sense. Phosphorous is a depleting <br /> resource which should be recycled by innovative techniques <br /> for a product for the benefit of society. <br /> We have recently received a copy of the Regional Policy Plan <br /> on Water Quality Management which the Metropolitan Council <br /> adopted on March 9 , 1979 . Chairman Charles Weaver stated in <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.