as-built survey history - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r t . . � Christine Mattson To: Adam Edwards Subject: RE: 1065 Linden Lane/#2013-01293 From: Adam Edwards Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2015 3:48 PM To: Christine Mattson Cc: Lyle Oman; Melanie Curtis; Jeremy Barnhart Subject: RE: 1065 Linden Lane/ #2013-01293 Chris, I noted the following discrepancies between the approved plan and the as built: 1. Drive way is different than plan. Proposed dr/iveway was at City allowed maximum width of 20' at Linden Lane. As-built driveway width at Linden Lane is 23'1 I'll need builder to modify to a conforming width. Different driveway layout okay-meets hardcover and setbacks. 2. Path to lower garage missing.,�ie path to the lower garage is part of our assumed hardcover for a lower level access with a garage door of 6' in width. I will have them add this'assumed' driveway to the hardcover calculations. 3. Planned Swimming pool missing. 4. Approved swale along north of property not depicted. There needs to be a drainage mechanism to ensure roof and surface runoff is not directed onto the neighboring property. (INSPECTOR TO VERRIFY DRAINAGEWAY) 5. Additional retaining walls on South east corner. Based on As built they appear to require a engineered design. Walls 4' or greater in height must be designed by a licensed professional, and plans must be submitted to the City for review prior to the approval of the permit.Walls less than 2X the height of the.�wall apart shall be considered one wall. (INSPECTOR TO VERRIFY DIMMENSIONS) �0�. 6.The survey is missing a scale Adam From: Christine Mattson Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2015 3:30 PM To: Adam Edwards Cc: Lyle Oman; Melanie Curtis; Jeremy Barnhart Subject: 1065 Linden Lane/ #2013-01293 Adam, We received an as-built survey dated 4-22-15 for the property addressed 1065 Linden Lane. Please review and note anything specific the building inspectors should look at during their site visit. Please return the file to me and I will schedule the site visit. Thank you! 1