Laserfiche WebLink
`. I;',i.�',ULAR PIEETIP7G OF TI3E ORONO COUNCIL, ,7APJUARY 15, 1980 Page 10 <br /> , <br /> F) P4r. P4cCleary now says that he would oppose STUBBS BAY STUDY AREA <br /> limiting the nroPerty to two units. He (Continued) <br /> would rnake no profit and may not cover his <br /> costs (?) . He sa��s he is. "tired of fighting" <br /> and would like tofreach a compromise with <br /> the City to allow quick sale and exit frorl . <br /> the property. He was pushing for no less <br /> than four units. <br /> G) Given the above, on January 2 , 1980 , P4a��or <br /> Van Nest r►ade the f_ollowing offer to P4r. <br /> McCleary: <br /> l. He could not guarantee Council agreement, <br /> but he individually would approve two <br /> units on site using the combined mound- <br /> holdinc� tank septic s��ster►. '^his is a <br /> density of one unit/acre. mhe P7a��or . <br /> notes that P4r. McCleary' s site now consists <br /> of two separate tax parcels. <br /> 2. In addition, he would support three units <br /> on site provided Mr. McCleary could prove <br /> some tvpe of acceptable sewac�e treatrlent <br /> (holding tanks or detailed engineerinc� <br /> analysis of some other system or cort- <br /> bination of systems) , and provided that <br /> Mr. McCleary would agree in writing to <br /> this proposal so that the rezoning and <br /> subdivision could proceed. "'hese would <br /> probably be three single farmily dwellings <br /> in a PRD type of develo�ment - density a- <br /> bout 0. 75 unit/acre. <br /> 3. The P'ta��or would oppose an_y more dense <br /> development except that four units might <br /> be possible in total if all of_ the East <br /> Lake properties were acc�uired and included <br /> in a combined project. But it apnears <br /> douhtful that the City could partici�ate <br /> in this, at least in the foreseeable future. <br /> P4r. P7cCleary was advised of the above on January 2 , <br /> 1980. He was asked to make a decision so that the <br /> City Attorney could draft an agreement for Council <br /> review and approval on January 15, 1980. To date, <br /> we have not received any response. <br />