Laserfiche WebLink
� . RE�ULAR P4EETIPIG OF THE OROTdO CnUr1CIL, nFCEMBFR 11, 1979 Page 14 <br /> 3. To restrict the coru�on, permitted type of FENCE ORDINANCE <br /> fencing to no rtore than 42 inches in heic�ht (Continued) <br /> and no more than ?_Oo opaque in any vard. This <br /> would allow snlit rail fences, certain picket <br /> fences, chain link, etc. while prohihiting <br /> solid vie�a-hlockinq fences. <br /> 4. To require security fencing around swimming <br /> pools. <br /> 5. `"o allow higher and/or riore onac�ue fencing <br /> in those special circumstances where such <br /> fences are normall1� rec�uired and/or where <br /> they could be erected adversel_y affectinc� <br /> neighborinq properties. <br /> Draft ;�3 attached includes those revisions <br /> discussed at the rlovember 17, 1979 joint Planning <br /> Cor,unission/Council meetinc� and has had the forriat <br /> of the new f_ence and �•�all sections (38. 950 et sec�. ) <br /> changed to be more readable. <br /> Council Meetinc� - December 11, 1979 <br /> r'ir. Olson also coru�ented on the public hearinc� <br /> held by the Planning Commission. <br /> Councilmer,iber P4assengale: T9e should consider <br /> eliminating walls or fences exce�t in instances <br /> of Planning Cortriission and Council consideration. <br /> Planning Comr�ission P4eriber Jabbour: I, as a <br /> Planning Commission member, voted against the <br /> proposed ordinance because it was contrar�� and <br /> we should go back to our ordinance. <br /> P4assengale moved, Butler seconded, to rec�uest the <br /> Planning Commission to review with staff and <br /> recommend to the Council their recoru�endation on <br /> the proposed fence ordinance kee�ing in mind that <br /> the value of open space is ir.tportant and ?t is <br /> the opinion and findings of the Citv Council that <br /> all open space has to be a priority concern that <br /> should be addressed when considering the proposed <br /> ordinance. l�otion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0) . <br /> Alan Olson, City Planner, entered into the record ACCESSORY BUILDING <br /> the following proposed accessory building amend- AT4ENDr2ENTS <br /> rnents dated Decertber 3, 1979 , which states: <br /> T expect to attend the public hearing to review <br /> this Ordinance draft and to answer any questions. <br /> (Continued) <br />