My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Re: survey-1990
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
L
>
Linden Lane
>
1015 Linden Lane - 07-117-23-13-0093
>
Correspondence
>
Re: survey-1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 5:30:58 PM
Creation date
5/4/2017 2:25:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
1015
Street Name
Linden
Street Type
Lane
Address
1015 Linden La
Document Type
Correspondence
PIN
0711723130093
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Tos Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator <br /> From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator <br /> Dates July 16, 1990 <br /> Subject: #1015 Linden Lane, Request by William C. Rallberg <br /> Please review Mr. Kallberg's letter, and my letter to him of <br /> June 25th. Brief ly, Mr. Ral lberg constructed a deck in his <br /> lakeshore yard without permits, which Lyle recently found. My <br /> letter of June 25th explains the process for obtaining a permit <br /> and notes that there is a possibility that a variance will be <br /> necessary. The applicant is requesting "relief" and apparently <br /> does not want to bear the cost of an as-bui lt survey or a <br /> variance. <br /> The attached documentation verifies that a variance was <br /> granted in 1977 to construct a new home, per a site plan labeled <br /> the "preferred plan" which then was revised by the applicant with <br /> a proposed location over the sewer line. The inspections <br /> department subsequently required a 10' setback from the City <br /> sewer. This might have pushed the house right up to the 75' <br /> setback, but there is no as-built survey to verify the final <br /> location of the house. <br /> Interesting to note is that the inspection record clearly <br /> shows that the person who built the house did not call for a <br /> footing inspection. There is no verification in the file that <br /> the City ever verified that the house was placed according to , <br /> Code or gave approval, as Rallberg alludes to, although we also <br /> have no documentation that the location wasn't checked. <br /> Because this case is similar to many we have been <br /> encountering lately, my recommendation is that Mr. Rallberg be <br /> advised by you or the Mayor that he should follow the procedures <br /> outlined by staff in the letter of June 25th. <br /> lsv <br /> � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.