10-30-1979 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

REGULAR N4EETIIIG OF TH� OROP10 COUPJCIL, OCi'OBr� 30, 1979 Page 9 I agree with P4r. �Oberhauser' s surunary iter.is on Paqe 4 , COPdDITIONAL USF. as f_ollo��s: 3701 Shoreline Dr. (Continued) l. The zone should be changed to B-�4. ^here is no logical reason to include the sewer line in this zone (the owner would have access to the sewer regardless of zone) . The actual zone boundar�� should include all commercial functions including parking, and perhaps should go to the west line of Lot 6. The depth would not need to be ?_00 ' as this is obviously flood �lain and wetlands. A reasonable straight line cor,►promise shoul� be determined through the rezoning process. 2 . The conservation and flowaqe easement should be over all designated flood plain, i .e, over all land below 935. If some of this land is not wetlands, sorme of the normal conservation" prohibitions could be amended as lc.sng as the flowage easement is assured. 3. I agree with the concept of ?tem 3, although I think the facts make anv difference between ��etlands and flood plain rather moot, or insignifi- cant at hest. This does not r.lean that I could not find hardships to justify sor.me variance to the 26 ' rule such as the suggested narking lot retaininc� wall. Council Pieetinc� - October 30 , 1979 P4r. Oberhauser, Bill P4cnueen, and John Nelson were present. Plr, t7cQueen reviewed a survey of the propertv in c�uestion cor,imenting that he purchased the nropert�� in 1966 and 1967 , and that this propert_y was assessed as commercial propert�� ' . for sewer and water. P4avor Van Nest commented that the B-� change was completed in 1974 to include this commercial prox�ert�� after dis- covering ommissions in the 1967 legal descriPtions. John Pdelson discussed concept of the Proposal commentinq that the proposed building would he rental, not condominiu*�s and that we want to develop an of_fice buildinc� of a . residential looking type of structure owned and operated only as an office building. Pir. Oberhauser reviewed the history of the land and the plans for development cor�mentinc� that the wetlands will not be constructed on and a conservation easement will be provided. . biayor Van Nest stated that wetlands have to he defined. �9etlands arE not cor_unercial property. (Continued)