My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-30-1979 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1979
>
10-30-1979 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/22/2015 12:43:59 PM
Creation date
4/22/2015 12:43:55 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Page 7 <br /> Planning S Zoning Administrator <br /> DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC. <br /> October 25, 1979 <br /> Page Three <br /> It is also my understanding that the purpose of a flood plain designation is to <br /> restrict the construction of occupied buildings within the flood plain so as to <br /> lessen the risk of property damage. The soil compositions of property within a <br /> flood plain may be clay or otherwise and have little, if any, water retension <br /> value and therefore, the same reasoning applicable to wetland may not apply to a <br /> f lood plain. <br /> Since this is the case, the purpose of the restriction in a flood plain is to <br /> require a developer of property to either fill the land that the structure is <br /> going to be place on, to an elevation above the flood plain designation or to <br /> use a type of construction so that the first floor of occupancy is at a <br /> designated level above the flood plain elevation. The requirement that a struc- <br /> ture and/or parking lot be set back from a flood plain contour line, has no <br /> logic when compared with the purpose that the flood plain was established for. <br /> An owner of property within a flood plain area should be able to construct a <br /> house on a parcel of land which has an elevation above the flood plain, placing <br /> his driveway in and out on an elevation which is within the flood plain and even <br /> build a tennis court or similar non-occupied structure within the flood plain. <br /> To prohibit these types of structures from being built within an area deaignated <br /> as flood plain but not designated as a wetland, would appear to be an <br /> unwarranted interference in the rights of a property owner without any off- <br /> setting public benefit. <br /> I feel that the protection that you are looking for, with reference to the pre- <br /> servation of the wetlands, is adequately covered by preserving the wetlands and <br /> restricting the construction within 26 feet of an area designated as a wetland. <br /> The developers are agreeable in granting to the City of Orono, an open space <br /> easement and/or conservation easement over the area designated as wetlands and <br /> are agreeable in consenting to a prohibition of any construction activities <br /> within 26 feet of this designated line. <br /> They are also agreeable to an easement which would prohibit them from <br /> constructing any structure designed for occupancy by humans within the area <br /> designated as a flood plain unless the structure so constructed was designed so <br /> that the occupied areas were above the designated elevation applicable to the <br /> flood plain in question. <br /> The developer would not want to put himself in a position that at a future date <br /> he could not construct a tennis court behind the office building for use by the <br /> occupsnts of the office building or aomeother similar type improvement. ltie <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.