Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETIi�C� OF ^'1iE ORONO COUNCIL, OCTOBER 16 , 1979 Page 7 <br /> Council P'Ieeting - October 16 , 1979 (.�T',DIT?ArJCF: '_'10. ?.25 <br /> Fence }toratorium <br /> Hurr moved, Butler seconded, to adopt Ordinance (Continue�) <br /> No. 225, An Ordinance Establishing A ?4oratorium <br /> On The Installation Or Issuance Of Permits For <br /> The Installation Of Any Type Of Fences Over Three . <br /> Feet Six Inches In Height, c�nditioned on a three- <br /> rl�nth moratorium with staff proPosal to be submitted <br /> by Plovember 13, 1979 Council Meetinc�. Motion, <br /> Ayes (4) - Nays (0) . <br /> Butler moved, ilassengale seconded, to apnrove SE�VF;R CONNECTION REPORT* <br /> the status report of sewer connections as of <br /> September 25, 1979 , prepared by P'lichael Gaffron, <br /> Septic System Inspector. ".�ti�n, Aves (4) - Nays (0) . <br /> Alan Olson, City Planner, entered into the record COPdDITIONAL USE PER'�IIT <br /> the request of_ ��Tarren Ortenhlad, 3870 Shoreline 3870 Shoreline Drive j <br /> Drive, for a conditional use permit dated �452 j <br /> October 4 , 1979, which states: ��7arren Ortenblad ' <br /> This proposal was approved by Council on July 10 , <br /> 1979, subject to resolution of access nroblems <br /> with Hennepin County and to drainage-flood plain <br /> plan review by the City Engineer, including <br /> provision of a flowage easement to the Citv. <br /> This report is to advise Council that we have <br /> finally received an official reply frori Hennepin <br /> County regarding the access. As vou can see by <br /> Mr. Iiustad' s October 1, 1979 letter, Hennenin <br /> County would deny use of their drivewa_y unless <br /> the City would accept dedication �f it as a ' <br /> public street. <br /> This option appears irrational as the actual <br /> function of the driveway would not change, it <br /> connects with no City street, and Hennenin <br /> County even offers to continue maintenance. If <br /> they are so concerned about liability, whv not <br /> dedicate the driveway to themselves as part of <br /> County Road 15 as the County is the r.ma�or user <br /> and continues to invite public tra.ffic to u�e the <br /> shops as over�low �arking. <br /> In any event, I would propose to replv to *Zr. <br /> Iiustad that the City will not accept dedication of <br /> the driveway as being contrary to Cit�� �olicy or <br /> to any logical Cit�� purpose. <br /> Because either access was aPproved, there is no <br /> need for any Council action on this natter, unless <br /> vou wish to direct me other than as above. (Continued) <br />