Laserfiche WebLink
State of Minnesota(City of Orono)v.Michael Finken <br /> On June 11, 2013,the City sent Defendant a second letter notifying him the guest <br /> apartment at the subject property would not be in compliance with Orono City Code § 78- <br /> 328(2)(b)until Defendant applied for and received a conditional use permit. Additionally, the <br /> letter notified Defendant that the guest apa.rtment was also in violation of Orono City Code § 78- <br /> 327(4) since it was being used to obtain rental income from paying guests. The letter instructed <br /> Defendant to discontinue the illegal use of the guest apartment by or before Monday July l, <br /> 2013, and that failure to do so may result in criminal prosecution. <br /> On August 21, 2013,the City sent Defendant a third letter regarding the code violations <br /> pertaining to the Defendant's guest apartment. The letter stated that the City had confumed that <br /> the tenants do indeed rent the guest apartment. The letter served as his fmal notification to <br /> remedy the code violation. The letter advised the Defendant to discontinue the use of the guest <br /> apartment by or before August 30, 2013, and that failure to do so may result in criminal <br /> prosecution. <br /> 3 � <br />